International Fives (i5s) - Register Interest

[Pkbaldy]

l think lists would need to be kept to the same size, otherwise there is potential for huge inbalances ....... therefore all trades should be 1 for 1, 2 for 2 etc

...On another note, team name for Mexico? :o surely this one should be easy enough

Mexico Lawnmowers

Mexico Landscapers

Mexican Cholos

Mexico Carnies

[upthemaidens]

l think lists would need to be kept to the same size, otherwise there is potential for huge inbalances ....... therefore all trades should be 1 for 1, 2 for 2 etc

...On another note, team name for Mexico? :o surely this one should be easy enough

Mexican Jumping Beans ,  Mexican Sombreros , Mexican Taco Kisses   ;D

[nostradamus]

Mexican Gringos

[Nige]

Mexican Cartel?

[T Dog]

Mexican siestas

[nrich102]

l think lists would need to be kept to the same size, otherwise there is potential for huge inbalances ....... therefore all trades should be 1 for 1, 2 for 2 etc

I think we should have maybe a minimum and maximum team size? Say minimum of 10 players and maximum of 25?

[nostradamus]

l think lists would need to be kept to the same size, otherwise there is potential for huge inbalances ....... therefore all trades should be 1 for 1, 2 for 2 etc

I think we should have maybe a minimum and maximum team size? Say minimum of 10 players and maximum of 25?

personally l think there would be a danger that the less experienced coaches could be taken advantage of this way ......... with even trading numbers there is alot less chance of it happening

[nas]

l think lists would need to be kept to the same size, otherwise there is potential for huge inbalances ....... therefore all trades should be 1 for 1, 2 for 2 etc

I think we should have maybe a minimum and maximum team size? Say minimum of 10 players and maximum of 25?

personally l think there would be a danger that the less experienced coaches could be taken advantage of this way ......... with even trading numbers there is alot less chance of it happening

Have to agree, as with others my first attempt, but have to go with the majority.

[Nige]

l think lists would need to be kept to the same size, otherwise there is potential for huge inbalances ....... therefore all trades should be 1 for 1, 2 for 2 etc

I think we should have maybe a minimum and maximum team size? Say minimum of 10 players and maximum of 25?

personally l think there would be a danger that the less experienced coaches could be taken advantage of this way ......... with even trading numbers there is alot less chance of it happening

Yeah, I agree with nost here, I don't think it's such a good idea to have varying lists sizes.



Also, PSK hasn't been on since New Year's Eve.  :( I kinda feel like it would be a formality to give him GAJ, but he may very well want Pendles instead.

[GM]

Yep draft 6 is motoring along.
1 pick a day ::).
With the 24hr rule which pick gets allocated?

[nas]

Yep draft 6 is motoring along.
1 pick a day ::).
With the 24hr rule which pick gets allocated?

Least yours is moving Zzzz

[Big Mac]

Yep draft 6 is motoring along.
1 pick a day ::).
With the 24hr rule which pick gets allocated?

Tabs hasn't been on since New Year's Eve so he probably won't take his first pick :(

[nostradamus]

Yep draft 6 is motoring along.
1 pick a day ::).
With the 24hr rule which pick gets allocated?

picks would be skipped not allocated

[Nige]

Yep draft 6 is motoring along.
1 pick a day ::).
With the 24hr rule which pick gets allocated?

picks would be skipped not allocated

Fairly sure Oss mentioned somewhere that they're being allocated.

[JBs-Hawks]

Usually ossie allocates not skips ;)