AF 2015 Profile: Isaac Heeney

[Ricochet]

Luke Parker is 184cm and 85kg, hopefully Heeney plays like him too

[SydneyRox]

He is bigger than guys like Hanners and KJack though Toga who share that inside/outside role, same body shape as Parker and Mitchell.

[nrich102]

You'd be mad. It to pick him if he's named round 1 and is not sub, however  I don't see that happening :(

Will go pick 1 or 2 in most XVs drafts I would think.

[SydneyRox]

Luke Parker is 184cm and 85kg, hopefully Heeney plays like him too

I am not sure my heart could take it!! :)

[Toga]

Must admit I did underestimate his size boys! Just doesn't look as bulky as some of the other draftees, that's probably a good thing though! Will probably have to lock him in if he is named rd 1 and looks like playing full games :)

[SydneyRox]

Must admit I did underestimate his size boys! Just doesn't look as bulky as some of the other draftees, that's probably a good thing though! Will probably have to lock him in if he is named rd 1 and looks like playing full games :)

I will steal Tabs thunder and tell you to stay away from Swans players in general (and especially rookies) cos in general they play roles more about the team results than fantasy friendly (he normally sounds better doing it though).

[Ricochet]

Must admit I did underestimate his size boys! Just doesn't look as bulky as some of the other draftees, that's probably a good thing though! Will probably have to lock him in if he is named rd 1 and looks like playing full games :)

I will steal Tabs thunder and tell you to stay away from Swans players in general (and especially rookies) cos in general they play roles more about the team results than fantasy friendly (he normally sounds better doing it though).

Have to admit I'm not listening to you Swans boys next year :P preseason last year told us to be cautious picking Swans players... Then Buddy, Parker, McGlynn, JPK, Malceski all turn out to be fantasy relevant :D

[Vinny]

Must admit I did underestimate his size boys! Just doesn't look as bulky as some of the other draftees, that's probably a good thing though! Will probably have to lock him in if he is named rd 1 and looks like playing full games :)

I will steal Tabs thunder and tell you to stay away from Swans players in general (and especially rookies) cos in general they play roles more about the team results than fantasy friendly (he normally sounds better doing it though).

Have to admit I'm not listening to you lot next year :P preseason last year told us to be cautious picking Swans players... Then Buddy, Parker, McGlynn, JPK, Malceski all turn out to be fantasy relevant :D

Yeah agreed hahaha, SR you are going to end up starting Parker, Titch & JPK. At the minimum.

[kilbluff1985]

Must admit I did underestimate his size boys! Just doesn't look as bulky as some of the other draftees, that's probably a good thing though! Will probably have to lock him in if he is named rd 1 and looks like playing full games :)

I will steal Tabs thunder and tell you to stay away from Swans players in general (and especially rookies) cos in general they play roles more about the team results than fantasy friendly (he normally sounds better doing it though).

Have to admit I'm not listening to you Swans boys next year :P preseason last year told us to be cautious picking Swans players... Then Buddy, Parker, McGlynn, JPK, Malceski all turn out to be fantasy relevant :D

it's a huge con mate

[pommyadam]

Must admit I did underestimate his size boys! Just doesn't look as bulky as some of the other draftees, that's probably a good thing though! Will probably have to lock him in if he is named rd 1 and looks like playing full games :)

I will steal Tabs thunder and tell you to stay away from Swans players in general (and especially rookies) cos in general they play roles more about the team results than fantasy friendly (he normally sounds better doing it though).

Have to admit I'm not listening to you Swans boys next year :P preseason last year told us to be cautious picking Swans players... Then Buddy, Parker, McGlynn, JPK, Malceski all turn out to be fantasy relevant :D

in fairness
Parker was a lock for me,
Buddy - I expected to win the Coleman (and he did) and expected him to score well because of that, avoided early on because of new club
Malceski - you knew what you were getting (a solid score, rather than undervalued)
JPK in a similar boat to Malceski, couldn't justify picking him over the likes of Watson/Rocky/Cotchin (premos that were undervalued)
honestly McGlynn was the shock for me, but there were numerous options to get him in with

Heeney (like ZJones and BJack before him) will probably eat a LOAD of vests if he does play, which makes him a no from me

[SydneyRox]

in my defence, i shouted to all who would listen that starting without buddy and jpk was silly and parker over titch. I didnt jump on eski, which is the first year ever i think, though i did enjoy Shaws rise, mcglynn was a position change that you can never fully trust at the swans!

Still, I dont think I will start heeny, though will be aiming to grab him in xvs

[Ricochet]

You'd be mad. It to pick him if he's named round 1 and is not sub, however  I don't see that happening :(

Will go pick 1 or 2 in most XVs drafts I would think.

Not in WXVs, he could be slipping all the way down to us at #3 :D

[Toga]

Or will he? >:D

[Ricochet]

Or will he? >:D

Please don't

[Toga]

 :o  ;)