FIGJAM 2015

[kilbluff1985]

TEAM NAME: figjam
DEF: B. Smith, M. Hibberd, T. McKenzie, H. Lumumba, P. Seedsman, B. Waters (N. Brown, H. Goddard)
MID: G. Ablett jnr, T. Rockliff, S. Pendlebury, D. Heppell, T. Greene, M. Crouch, I. Heeney, A. Vandenberg (N. Freeman, N. Krakouer, A. Neal-Bullen)
RUC: T. Goldstein, N. Naitanui (M. Cox)
FWD: D. Swan, T. Mitchell, T. Bellchambers, J. Freeman, T. Membrey, M. Clark (J. Hogan, C. Daniel)
CASH LEFT: $2,100

very different setup to most here but i like it hoping the midfield can make up for the forward line obviously well aware of the weakness up forward

[AaronKirk]

TEAM NAME: figjam
DEF: B. Smith, M. Hibberd, T. McKenzie, H. Lumumba, P. Seedsman, B. Waters (N. Brown, H. Goddard)
MID: G. Ablett jnr, T. Rockliff, S. Pendlebury, D. Heppell, T. Greene, M. Crouch, I. Heeney, A. Vandenberg (N. Freeman, N. Krakouer, A. Neal-Bullen)
RUC: T. Goldstein, N. Naitanui (M. Cox)
FWD: D. Swan, T. Mitchell, T. Bellchambers, J. Freeman, T. Membrey, M. Clark (J. Hogan, C. Daniel)
CASH LEFT: $2,100

very different setup to most here but i like it hoping the midfield can make up for the forward line obviously well aware of the weakness up forward

I can understand the reasoning behind the defense but there is too much POD risk in defence. Maybe one of Cannon, the Prince or the Seed but not all 3 IMO.

Is M.Crouch a lock for best 22 at Adelaide? How will the GWS mids go in 2015 - a lot of talented mids battling for not many spots.

You know what's wrong with the forwards. I don't think the benefits of the Defence and Mids make up for the lack of premo's in the forwards.

Would be a massive win if this side caught fire, but I don't see it happening mate.

[kilbluff1985]

hopefully there are 3 decent rookie defenders so i can drop a defender and get Tom Mitchell as another forward

[kilbluff1985]

which team do you prefer the above one or this one?

[Money Shot]

I prefer team 1.
Just gives you those super premiums from the get go.
Would love your thoughts on my team.

[Big Mac]

Ablett - 130
Rockliff - 125
Brayshaw - 60
Total: 315
vs
Watson - 115
Greene - 105
Macrae - 105
Total: 325

On that I guess team 2. Although I can't see either Greene or Macrae being top 10 mids.
I'd prefer to take the first team, downgrade Rockliff to Watson and Bellchambers to Membrey and then shore up the defense a bit

[kilbluff1985]

Ablett - 130
Rockliff - 125
Brayshaw - 60
Total: 315
vs
Watson - 115
Greene - 105
Macrae - 105
Total: 325

On that I guess team 2. Although I can't see either Greene or Macrae being top 10 mids.
I'd prefer to take the first team, downgrade Rockliff to Watson and Bellchambers to Membrey and then shore up the defense a bit

yeah but points per week would be about even once you take into account captains scores

[fasttrack13]

Ablett - 130
Rockliff - 125
Brayshaw - 60
Total: 315
vs
Watson - 115
Greene - 105
Macrae - 105
Total: 325

On that I guess team 2. Although I can't see either Greene or Macrae being top 10 mids.
I'd prefer to take the first team, downgrade Rockliff to Watson and Bellchambers to Membrey and then shore up the defense a bit

Change Bradshaw to Biggs and I'd be thinking 10pts the other way :P

[Ricochet]

Ablett - 130
Rockliff - 125
Brayshaw - 60
Total: 315
vs
Watson - 115
Greene - 105
Macrae - 105
Total: 325

On that I guess team 2. Although I can't see either Greene or Macrae being top 10 mids.
I'd prefer to take the first team, downgrade Rockliff to Watson and Bellchambers to Membrey and then shore up the defense a bit

tough on Brayshaw only averaging 60. Think he'll easily push 80+

[eaglesman]

Ablett - 130
Rockliff - 125
Brayshaw - 60
Total: 315
vs
Watson - 115
Greene - 105
Macrae - 105
Total: 325

On that I guess team 2. Although I can't see either Greene or Macrae being top 10 mids.
I'd prefer to take the first team, downgrade Rockliff to Watson and Bellchambers to Membrey and then shore up the defense a bit

tough on Brayshaw only averaging 60. Think he'll easily push 80+

Makes brayshaw a lock then

[blue]

Watson, Heppell, hibberd, Goddard and Bellchambers.
Way to many players from the one side, need a more even spread

[Ricochet]

Ablett - 130
Rockliff - 125
Brayshaw - 60
Total: 315
vs
Watson - 115
Greene - 105
Macrae - 105
Total: 325

On that I guess team 2. Although I can't see either Greene or Macrae being top 10 mids.
I'd prefer to take the first team, downgrade Rockliff to Watson and Bellchambers to Membrey and then shore up the defense a bit

tough on Brayshaw only averaging 60. Think he'll easily push 80+

Makes brayshaw a lock then

Yes it does.

Watson, Heppell, hibberd, Goddard and Bellchambers.
Way to many players from the one side, need a more even spread

Not always. THey don't all play in the same position on the ground so it doesn't really matter too much

[kilbluff1985]

Watson, Heppell, hibberd, Goddard and Bellchambers.
Way to many players from the one side, need a more even spread

not really, only Watson and Heppell have similar roles Goddard plays forward often and Belly is a ruck

[blue]

Watson, Heppell, hibberd, Goddard and Bellchambers.
Way to many players from the one side, need a more even spread

Not always. THey don't all play in the same position on the ground so it doesn't really matter too much
[/quote]

What about bye structure then they are all round 12. Add you pies, Suns and Saints players into that mix

[kilbluff1985]

i'm not caring about byes i'm picking players i want not going to change the team for 3 rounds