Main Menu

Australia vs Pakistan

Started by Bill Manspeaker, October 06, 2014, 12:40:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bill Manspeaker

#45
Quote from: Nails on October 11, 2014, 01:54:57 AM
Quote from: brad on October 11, 2014, 01:53:52 AM
Pakistan all 215

good work boys

time for a shower

a shower or a shower?

a nice hot and steamy shower

nah as in shower under water

Bill Manspeaker


Bill Manspeaker

in a bit of trouble at 3-75. very long tail

need Maxy and Bailey to bat for a while. Maxy dropped as I was writing.

cmon boys

Bill Manspeaker

current partnership of 59 between Maxy and Bailey

85 runs required. 23 overs to go. 7 wickets in the bank.

BANG Maxy 6. sweeeeeet

Bill Manspeaker

Aussies win by 5 wickets. that means we have now won the series as well. flower yeah.

sleeeeeeep

Bill Manspeaker

Australia won the toss and elected to bat in the last ODI

let's get a win here and keep the momentum going in to the tests

tbagrocks

Which Pakistan will show up? The one that can make a WC final or the one that shreeks in fear for their families safety because of their um, culture?

Sheesh, just want a good game

Cameron White must feel unlucky with the way he's started the domestic season!

tbagrocks

One think for sure, on or off, playing well or cheating. Boom Boom is entertaining ;D

tbagrocks

Just curious now who comes into the Test team, a few changes and maybe not the Captain

Id like to keep Faulkner, just think he's a gun, Flintoff or Cairns style

GoLions

Faulkner should take over Watson's position as all-rounder

Mitch Marsh could possibly make a claim there, but I'd prefer to get some Faulk on my fork

tbagrocks

Quote from: GoLions on October 12, 2014, 10:27:06 PM
Faulkner should take over Watson's position as all-rounder

Mitch Marsh could possibly make a claim there, but I'd prefer to get some Faulk on my fork
Just agree, Marsh a fine young man but the Faulk is such a competitor, rather the Faulk at this stage, sorry Marshy but you need to prove yourself mate! This is the Australian Test team we are talking about!

Jay

Not sure Faulk is a test match quality fast bowler. Excels in the short formats with his variety but in the longer form of the game I can see him struggling against good batsman.

Have him in the category as not quite good enough batsman and not quite good enough bowler. Need an all-rounder to be one of those things.. Maybe I'm being a bit picky, Kallis' and Flintoff's don't grow on trees :-\

Torpedo10

Quote from: Jayman on October 12, 2014, 10:36:34 PM
Not sure Faulk is a test match quality fast bowler. Excels in the short formats with his variety but in the longer form of the game I can see him struggling against good batsman.

Have him in the category as not quite good enough batsman and not quite good enough bowler. Need an all-rounder to be one of those things.. Maybe I'm being a bit picky, Kallis' and Flintoff's don't grow on trees :-\
That's why we have to settle Jay,co think Faulk could at least compete at the Test level.

tbagrocks

Going to be either the Faulk or Younger Marsh

Marsh only impressed the last few months after struggling but the Faulk has the game needed to compete?

Am a big rap for Mitch March but, what has he done in a Longer version of the game? Nothing, time will tell

Just don't go giving away Test caps, Boof is smarter than that

Jay

Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 12, 2014, 10:40:30 PM
Quote from: Jayman on October 12, 2014, 10:36:34 PM
Not sure Faulk is a test match quality fast bowler. Excels in the short formats with his variety but in the longer form of the game I can see him struggling against good batsman.

Have him in the category as not quite good enough batsman and not quite good enough bowler. Need an all-rounder to be one of those things.. Maybe I'm being a bit picky, Kallis' and Flintoff's don't grow on trees :-\
That's why we have to settle Jay,co think Faulk could at least compete at the Test level.
Would rather just play a proper batsman. Our bowling attack is good enough.