Trade Period One Submission and approval 2014

[powersuperkents]

Okay I'm back & it looks like the situation is set to be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties

Ele & I both have mutual feelings about Beams  ;) But they are purely our opinion and not fantasy related  :P

[kilbluff1985]

ok big 3 way trade here boys

Colorado Avalanche give David Swallow
Colorado Avalanche get Nick Malceski

Anaheim Mighty Ducks give NAT 10 + Daniel Rich
Anaheim Mighty Ducks get David Swallow

Boston Terriers give Nick Malceski
Boston Terriers get Daniel Rich + NAT 10

T Dog had confirmed he was fine with it last night and ele confirmed this morning i just woke up so i assume it's ok to post it i think it's win win for everybody tdog gets one of the best defenders in the comp to replace Swallow, ele has lots of defenders so he gets some youth for one of his older ones and i get an upgrade on Rich and i have enough early NAT picks losing #10 doesn't really hurt me

[elephants]

Yep, confirmed.

[SydneyRox]

Yep, confirmed.

no doubt you would confirm.

I have some serious reservations about this one

sorry ele, but mainly your part. but on the reverse for KB as well.

[T Dog]

ok big 3 way trade here boys

Colorado Avalanche give David Swallow
Colorado Avalanche get Nick Malceski

Anaheim Mighty Ducks give NAT 10 + Daniel Rich
Anaheim Mighty Ducks get David Swallow

Boston Terriers give Nick Malceski
Boston Terriers get Daniel Rich + NAT 10

T Dog had confirmed he was fine with it last night and ele confirmed this morning i just woke up so i assume it's ok to post it i think it's win win for everybody tdog gets one of the best defenders in the comp to replace Swallow, ele has lots of defenders so he gets some youth for one of his older ones and i get an upgrade on Rich and i have enough early NAT picks losing #10 doesn't really hurt me

T Dog confirms. Needed a gun back as Swallow may be mid only.

[kilbluff1985]

really? i think it's one of the fairest trades going around

David Swallow losing defender status will be mid only i think him for Malceski is fair
Malceski is worth around NAT 5 so he gets NAT 10 and Rich to make up the difference
Daniel Rich + NAT 10 is worth about NAT 5 i don't see the issue

[elephants]

I'm giving up the best defender in the game, who will always be a defender and has just signed a three year contract at a rapidly improving club. I wouldn't be surprised to see Eski go bigger next season hence why I took a while to confirm it myself.

Think KB has broken it down pretty well, at best Rich is a 100ave mid? Maybe. Will always get a tag which hampers his output and coming off an ACL he'll be very rusty.

Ugh, I think I've just talked myself out of this haha fk.

[powersuperkents]

Only one I would consider short changed is Colorado due to the age discrepancies between Swallow & Malceski. However, when considering the context, Colorado already have an impressive midfield, and if Swallow loses dpp status he therefore becomes expendable. If Colorado needs cover in the backs, Malceski is a premium and he is guaranteed 3 seasons minimum from him. So really I would personally say it is up to the coaches discretion with this trade. If Colorado lacked midfield stock I would think there is fair calls for objections. But considering their list, the loss of a midfielder (who would push another starter into an emergency role) for a starting defender (pushing a lower quality defender into an emergency role - i.e. an upgrade), I think it's Colorado's call and they have made their intentions clear and justified them adequately.

Just how I would theoretical approach this - overall, legitimate trade - all parties seem to benefit (remember Ele is only gaining Daniel Rich as a player - Swallow & Eski are obvious starters - conversely, Rich as a midfielder not of the same quality of the first two and Anaheim made it clear they wanted to upgrade Rich for a premium mid - NAT 10 evens the trade)

[powersuperkents]

Two Phase Trade between Santiago, Boston & Houston.

Phase 1 -
Santiago Gives: Claye Beams
Boston Gives: NAT Pick #36

Phase 2 -
Boston Gives: Claye Beams
Houston Gives: NAT Pick #33

Ultimately:
Santiago -
Gives: Claye Beams
Receives: NAT 36

Boston -
Gives: NAT 36
Receives: NAT 33

Houston -
Gives: NAT 33
Receives: Claye Beams

May appear like Boston provides lack of consideration in this trade to those who are not aware of yesterday's unprecedented incident - i.e. 'tradegate'. Think of Boston's gain as a remedy for Santiago's malfeasance.  :)

Ele & FF to confirm

[SydneyRox]

you do like big words PSK.... (running off to dictionary.com )

[powersuperkents]

you do like big words PSK.... (running off to dictionary.com )

Are those parentheses indicating how you constructed the first sentence  :P

haha I'll tone it down

[Football Factory]

I was scratching around for another word for confirm but i couldn't be bothered trying to put it into a sentence   ;D

I confirm

[powersuperkents]

I was scratching around for another word for confirm but i couldn't be bothered trying to put it into a sentence   ;D

I confirm

'I accept' would serve the same purpose  :P

[SydneyRox]

you do like big words PSK.... (running off to dictionary.com )

Are those parentheses indicating how you constructed the first sentence  :P

haha I'll tone it down

LOL. very nice!

[powersuperkents]

Okay let's all stop with the vocabularies because it's detracting from what's relevant.

From now on only footy jargon is permitted