General Discussion

[Football Factory]

Everyone should be allowed to have an opinion and give suggestions. If nobody ever came up with ideas or suggestions you wouldn't be putting your idea forward for academy players.

[Football Factory]

 ^You can always start a new thread for it, don't want it getting lost amongst general discussion.^

[LF]

http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,105398.0.html

[popedelio]

On the academy thing, I'm not too much of a fan, I don't really see the point in adding it in. I see it more of a fun inclusion, but one that isn't needed. Will only make the draft more complicated, so why fix a system that ain't broke?

But my input is rather us do a mini draft, somehow zone all the teams where say for example Washington and Dallas can only acadamy a player from NSW/ACT or Tasmania, whereas Los Angeles and Arizona can only select players from WA etc.

On the Essendon thing I have Paddy Ryder, which is a reasonable loss, a big loss in my SC though :'( happy to do whatever you're coming up with LF

[Pkbaldy]

On the academy thing, I'm not too much of a fan, I don't really see the point in adding it in. I see it more of a fun inclusion, but one that isn't needed. Will only make the draft more complicated, so why fix a system that ain't broke?

But my input is rather us do a mini draft, somehow zone all the teams where say for example Washington and Dallas can only acadamy a player from NSW/ACT or Tasmania, whereas Los Angeles and Arizona can only select players from WA etc.

On the Essendon thing I have Paddy Ryder, which is a reasonable loss, a big loss in my SC though :'( happy to do whatever you're coming up with LF

That's fine. The original idea was that... But it would of made things much more complicated, as there are only about 4 or 5 kids drafted through the academy each year and we have 12 teams :P But all good. I still like it ;) Be fun haha.

I'd help you out with Ryder... But i've only got Gawn and Lycett now...

[popedelio]

On the academy thing, I'm not too much of a fan, I don't really see the point in adding it in. I see it more of a fun inclusion, but one that isn't needed. Will only make the draft more complicated, so why fix a system that ain't broke?

But my input is rather us do a mini draft, somehow zone all the teams where say for example Washington and Dallas can only acadamy a player from NSW/ACT or Tasmania, whereas Los Angeles and Arizona can only select players from WA etc.

On the Essendon thing I have Paddy Ryder, which is a reasonable loss, a big loss in my SC though :'( happy to do whatever you're coming up with LF

That's fine. The original idea was that... But it would of made things much more complicated, as there are only about 4 or 5 kids drafted through the academy each year and we have 12 teams :P But all good. I still like it ;) Be fun haha.

I'd help you out with Ryder... But i've only got Gawn and Lycett now...

Yeah fair enough, its not like I'm against the idea, you put in some solid work it seems so kudos. But yer I sort of don't want the extra hassel it brings to the draft, especially since it's not live, meaning it could take a bit more time waiting for bids and matches. I know that sounds stupid since we do have like 3 months from draft to pre season so time isn't an issue but yer hahahaha

Nahh losing Ryder in this competition shouldn't hurt too much unless blitz goes down, it's in SC where it stings, but oh well it's only 1 season at the end of the day

[popedelio]

With player positions, are we sticking what we did last season? Or are we going to allow new changes when dpp get added in rd 3?

[LF]

With player positions, are we sticking what we did last season? Or are we going to allow new changes when dpp get added in rd 3?

We use the RDT site not AF so all player positions are locked in as is now for the whole season.