Which is a better midfield?

[Kellogscrunchynut]

The system that Sydney have going is the best in the business, although that doesn't mean Freo can't have their day.

[GoLions]

Sydney has by far the best midfield depth. More players who can regularly get 20+ disposals than any other club.

Pretty much all clubs have strong top end stuff, that's not what separates them

Agree with this. You don't have the best 4/5, but you have so many guys at that top level who can play in the mids.

Back to the original question how is this

Fyfe = Kennedy (arguments can go on for days)
Barlow < Jack
Mundy < Parker
Hill > Jetta
Crowley >  McGlynn (call it tagger for tagger)
Neale <<< Hanners
Sutcliffe <<<< McVeigh
Suban << Mitchell
Sandi >> Pyke

I'd argue Mundy and Barlow are better than Jack and Parker

[Pkbaldy]

Sydney has by far the best midfield depth. More players who can regularly get 20+ disposals than any other club.

Pretty much all clubs have strong top end stuff, that's not what separates them

Agree with this. You don't have the best 4/5, but you have so many guys at that top level who can play in the mids.

Back to the original question how is this

Fyfe = Kennedy (arguments can go on for days)
Barlow < Jack
Mundy < Parker
Hill > Jetta
Crowley >  McGlynn (call it tagger for tagger)
Neale <<< Hanners
Sutcliffe <<<< McVeigh
Suban << Mitchell
Sandi >> Pyke

I'd argue Mundy and Barlow are better than Jack and Parker

+1. Lachie Neale will be be a super star in a few years. But for now, Hanners has him. But yeah i'd argue the Barlow and Mundy case.... Parker has been on song all year.

[Mailman the 2nd]

uh Parker has been much better than Mundy this year.

Jack and Barlow have been pretty even

[Holz]

Next year

Ablett
Prestia
Swallow
Bennell
Martin
Lobergan
Boston

Game over.

[Ringo]

You left out O'Meara Holz.

[kilbluff1985]

Lonergan? Lol has shown absolutely nothing

[Samsturmfels]

Next year

Ablett
Prestia
Swallow
Bennell
Martin
Lobergan
Boston

Game over.

U also forgot Stanley and Rischitelli

[Jukes]

Using my high-tech system that is 99.999% accurate,
Fyfe 10/10, Barlow 9/10, Mundy 8.5/10, Hill 8.5/10, Crowley 8.5/10, Neale 9/10, Sutcliffe 7/10, Suban 7/10, Rucks 10/10
JPK 10/10, Jack 10/10, Parker 9/10, Jetta 7.5/10, McGlynn 8/10, Hannenbery 8.5/10, McVeigh 8.5/10, Titch 8.5/10, Rucks 7.5/10
Totals 77.5 vs 77.5

Dead even imo if you include rucks (which makes up a huge difference), but on only actual midfield players swans win.

[Vinny]

Agree on the midfielders alone, Swans are stronger however if you include the rucks which are a part of the midfield obviously, Freo becomes on par.

[Holz]

You left out O'Meara Holz.

than its even more game over.

[Mailman the 2nd]

I don't think so, looking at the Suns, they only had 2 real consistent A grade midfielders this year in Prestia and Ablett.

Swallow, O'Meara were good in extended patches but not really elite status consistent. Bennell is extremely inconsistent still, Martin is still a B- player and the rest are still all B's on their best day.

Next year they still will be well off the pace of the top midfield. Still lack real depth and A graders

[kilbluff1985]

i really like GWS midfield

Ward, Treloar, Greene, Coniglio, Shiel, Whitfield, Devon Smith, Scully, Josh Kelly, Hoskin-Elliot

[Mailman the 2nd]

GWS looks to have better future depth. Some of their key disposal getters just need to get more efficient with ball use.

[Ziplock]

i really like GWS midfield

Ward, Treloar, Greene, Coniglio, Shiel, Whitfield, Devon Smith, Scully, Josh Kelly, Hoskin-Elliot

Top 8 next year.