AXVS: OFFICIAL TRADE THREAD (2014/15)

[Adamant]

Bears give: R16 + R48
Llamas give: Sam Kerridge + Ben Jacobs

Reason: Just need players that play to fill my list.

Tbag to confirm.

[tbagrocks]

Bears give: R16 + R48
Llamas give: Sam Kerridge + Ben Jacobs

Reason: Just need players that play to fill my list.

Tbag to confirm.

Moving on good youngsters but they are only just good at this stage. Feel the depth of the rest on these lines is enough for us and it helps the balance of what we need to do with the list come the drafts

Confirm

[Ricochet]

Kathmandu gives: McGovern + Honeychurch
Kathmandu receives: Betts + Trengove + R31 + N66

Taiwan gives: Betts + N66
Taiwan receives: Honeychurch + N38

KL Crocs give: Trengove + N38 + R31
KL Crocs receive: McGovern

Period 1

Kathmandu gives: 
Kathmandu receives: R31 + N66

Taiwan gives: N66
Taiwan receives: N38

KL Crocs give: N38 + R31
KL Crocs receive:

Period 2

Kathmandu gives: McGovern + Honeychurch
Kathmandu receives: Betts + Trengove

Taiwan gives: Betts
Taiwan receives: Honeychurch

KL Crocs give: Trengove
KL Crocs receive: McGovern


Memph and PB to confirm

[Jroo]

Is that Jackson Trengove?

Wowee, this is going to start some shower...

[PowerBug]

Is that Jackson Trengove?

Wowee, this is going to start some shower...

In what way?


I give up a 90avg fwd. But in return I get a 100avg forward, who is only 27yo, another player who get games (albeit not that great in terms of scoring), and two dud picks which are probably worth equal to Honeychurch anyway.
On my side it seems fair, so I confirm this.

[Jroo]

Is that Jackson Trengove?

Wowee, this is going to start some shower...

In what way?


I give up a 90avg fwd. But in return I get a 100avg forward, who is only 27yo, another player who get games (albeit not that great in terms of scoring), and two dud picks which are probably worth equal to Honeychurch anyway.
On my side it seems fair, so I confirm this.

Just because of McGovern and Hibbo. If he's basically worth Hibbo, surely he's worth more than Jackson Trengove?

[Nige]

Crocs get McGovern, easy win.  :P

[Rusty00]

Is that Jackson Trengove?

Wowee, this is going to start some shower...

In what way?


I give up a 90avg fwd. But in return I get a 100avg forward, who is only 27yo, another player who get games (albeit not that great in terms of scoring), and two dud picks which are probably worth equal to Honeychurch anyway.
On my side it seems fair, so I confirm this.

Just because of McGovern and Hibbo. If he's basically worth Hibbo, surely he's worth more than Jackson Trengove?

He is worth more than Jackson Trengove, hence the rest of the players picks involved in the trade.

[PowerBug]

Eskimos give: Zach Merrett + N57
Tigers give: James Kelly + N35

TP1:
Eskimos give: N57
Tigers give: N35

TP2:
Eskimos give: Zach Merrett
Tigers give: James Kelly

I give up a mid with a future, but I have heaps of those. I get a player who is apparently going to be a defender next season, which I like. :) JROO to confirm.

[Jroo]

Yep confirmed. Kelly is one of the top scoring defenders there is, but is near the end of his career. I've already traded a few gun youngsters in Menzel, Seedsman, Hunter and co. so would like someone to replace them.

[Nige]

I like PB's bold trading strategy, given up three gun kids who suit the scoring system (Lennon, McGovern, Zerrett) to boost depth. Probably wouldn't have done it myself, because I'm a massive fan of all three kids and the team really needed good young forwards/DPP players but definitely a smart idea.

[PowerBug]

I like PB's bold trading strategy, given up three gun kids who suit the scoring system (Lennon, McGovern, Zerrett) to boost depth. Probably wouldn't have done it myself, because I'm a massive fan of all three kids and the team really needed good young forwards/DPP players but definitely a smart idea.

Depth! These guys (Betts anyway) are starters!

[Nige]

I like PB's bold trading strategy, given up three gun kids who suit the scoring system (Lennon, McGovern, Zerrett) to boost depth. Probably wouldn't have done it myself, because I'm a massive fan of all three kids and the team really needed good young forwards/DPP players but definitely a smart idea.

Depth! These guys (Betts anyway) are starters!

When I said depth, I kinda meant boosting the numbers on each line/increasing the quality. It's pretty plain to see that the Eskimos forward line trailed off fairly quickly.

[PowerBug]

I like PB's bold trading strategy, given up three gun kids who suit the scoring system (Lennon, McGovern, Zerrett) to boost depth. Probably wouldn't have done it myself, because I'm a massive fan of all three kids and the team really needed good young forwards/DPP players but definitely a smart idea.

Depth! These guys (Betts anyway) are starters!

When I said depth, I kinda meant boosting the numbers on each line/increasing the quality. It's pretty plain to see that the Eskimos forward line trailed off fairly quickly.

Yeah I'm still working on that, one more and I'll be very happy.


I hope the boss comes online soon to neg/accept these trades, there's more I want to make, some including on-trading. Would be poor if he didn't show up.

[BB67th]

I won't be able to process trades tonight, but I do have time to pop my head in and confirm/block them.

Bears give: R16 + R48
Llamas give: Sam Kerridge + Ben Jacobs

Reason: Just need players that play to fill my list.

Tbag to confirm.

Moving on good youngsters but they are only just good at this stage. Feel the depth of the rest on these lines is enough for us and it helps the balance of what we need to do with the list come the drafts

Confirm

APPROVED

Reasoning: Kerridge is a promising young player who looks like who could turn out to be a decent scorer. Jacobs has struggled for game time at North, but also shows a bit of promise. The picks are about even for them.

Eskimos give: Zach Merrett + N57
Tigers give: James Kelly + N35

TP1:
Eskimos give: N57
Tigers give: N35

TP2:
Eskimos give: Zach Merrett
Tigers give: James Kelly

I give up a mid with a future, but I have heaps of those. I get a player who is apparently going to be a defender next season, which I like. :) JROO to confirm.

APPROVED

Reasoning: Kelly is a high scorer but near the end of his career, with the probability of gaining DPP. Merrett is a solid young player who will be a good scorer, but is not at his peak yet. The pick swap balances it.