Main Menu

Off Season Trade Rumours

Started by Ricochet, September 01, 2014, 02:44:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mr.Craig

Well, a bigger chance than Collingwood that's for sure.

Purple 77

Quote from: My Chumps on October 07, 2014, 01:31:02 PM
Quote from: Purple 77 on October 07, 2014, 01:24:27 PM
Oh bloody hell I don't need another melbourne player in my WXVs with Garlett already there lol
We'll take em :P

Honestly though Garlett's got a lot of potential. Only issue is they've already got JKH, Salem and Barry who can play that small forwards role.

Kent too. I personally don't rate Barry, don't even think he can even play that role IMO. He only got in the senior side for being a tagger, yet Melbourne didn't play him as a one  ???


I also think the ultimate goal for Salem is to play in the midfield, but yeah I  think there are other clubs that could use him more than us

Rusty00

Quote from: Purple 77 on October 07, 2014, 02:07:42 PM
........... but yeah I  think there are other clubs that could use him more than us
Like Carlton :-X

Vinny

Quote from: Rusty00 on October 07, 2014, 02:15:46 PM
Quote from: Purple 77 on October 07, 2014, 02:07:42 PM
........... but yeah I  think there are other clubs that could use him more than us
Like Carlton :-X

Ricochet

Pies now looking at Treloar and GWS if Brissie can't come to the table with an appropriate Beams deal

Purple 77

If Carlton needed him they would have been playing him  :P he didn't get injured or anything this year

Must have rubbed Malthouse the wrong way?

WCarey18

Quote from: Ricochet on October 07, 2014, 02:46:21 PM
Pies now looking at Treloar and GWS if Brissie can't come to the table with an appropriate Beams deal

@barrettdamian: Something @CollingwoodFC is very keen on, is the possibility of @GWS_Giants Adam Treloar being part of the Beams deal

@barrettdamian: Collingwood has an idea, if Brisbane don't offer more than pick 5, they're going to explore options for Beams

Best to always include sources.  :P

Ricochet

Meh its only rumour and talk so nothing official.


If Pies can land Treloar and Greenwood for Beams and Lumumba they have done very well

WCarey18

Quote from: Ricochet on October 07, 2014, 02:56:09 PM
Meh its only rumour and talk so nothing official.

If Pies can land Treloar and Greenwood for Beams and Lumumba they have done very well

Agreed. North were front runners bringing Waite and Higgins for nothing, but have taken a massive step back losing Greenwood.

strikes91

Can't see GWS trading Treloar.

and why do the pies want Pick 5 and Hanley but just a straight swap for treloar, why not pick 4 and treloar like they've been pushing brisbane

Bill Manspeaker

what's the use of Beams leaving if he doesn't get to his prefered destination

WCarey18

Quote from: brad on October 07, 2014, 03:35:41 PM
what's the use of Beams leaving if he doesn't get to his prefered destination

Has said he'd like to go to Brisbane all along, but if he can't get there (due to trade loggerheads), he'd have to settle for GWS, and I'm sure they'd gladly have him.

SydneyRox

Beams to Swans for Reid and Membrey 8)

Jay

Quote from: WCarey18 on October 07, 2014, 03:37:32 PM
Quote from: brad on October 07, 2014, 03:35:41 PM
what's the use of Beams leaving if he doesn't get to his prefered destination

Has said he'd like to go to Brisbane all along, but if he can't get there (due to trade loggerheads), he'd have to settle for GWS, and I'm sure they'd gladly have him.
You know Western Sydney isn't in Queensland, right? :P

elephants

Quote from: Jayman on October 07, 2014, 03:41:46 PM
Quote from: WCarey18 on October 07, 2014, 03:37:32 PM
Quote from: brad on October 07, 2014, 03:35:41 PM
what's the use of Beams leaving if he doesn't get to his prefered destination

Has said he'd like to go to Brisbane all along, but if he can't get there (due to trade loggerheads), he'd have to settle for GWS, and I'm sure they'd gladly have him.
You know Western Sydney isn't in Queensland, right? :P

Its closer than Vic though? #clutchingatstraws :P