Draft and Mini Trade for Relinquished Teams Players.

Started by Ringo, August 22, 2014, 11:24:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Nige

Aish and Bontempelli are also every chance of becoming the next Daniel Menzel or they could possibly end up with depression and have to take a indefinite hiatus like Mitch Clark.

Spite

Quote from: luvfooty on August 23, 2014, 02:57:46 PM
Quote from: Spite on August 23, 2014, 02:50:30 PM
Quote from: Vinny on August 23, 2014, 02:38:28 PM
Keeping older players for the sake of being competitive isn't worth it IMO, especially when you are only going to be competitive for a year or two with them.

It seems like we just want the competition to be competitive with all the teams short-term. There is literally no point in that, When a team has a bad list it will take time for them to get competitive and they'll have to trade out their older players and get younger ones and wait for them to develop, it just how a rebuild is.

The only reason AFL teams carry their older players during a rebuild is so they can mentor the younger guys and there is a certain level of experience guiding the rest of the team. It isn't like that in XVs.

Ok fine so explain to me this - not including people who didn't draft their initial team - why are we helping anyone for their own fault of drafting a terrible team? It was literally two seasons ago, how can people mess up so badly they need to have concession after concession? If they drafted a team with the AIM of being successful in five or so years (therefore drafting young guns) then they deserve to be at the bottom since it was their plan and they do not deserve to have these extra picks to help them out.

Any bonus for coming near last should be phased out now and not re-added to the game for atleast two more seasons.

If the recycled player draft is going to be used how it's planning to be used - I vote that it be scrapped and all players go into the NATIONAL draft. Then teams wanting young players will get more young players and everyone gets what they want.
For example - we will pick up a 22 year old, meaning a first rounder in real life will slip into the second round for steins etc to take

I originally suggested the players from the 2 teams should go straight to the rookie draft and not have a recycled player draft
Nat Draft should just be kept for best new young draftees and nobody else.

I'm sorry LF it was an oversight on my behalf, I fully didn't expect the draft to go like this.

The reason I say national draft over rookie draft is because if they go in the rookie draft it will pretty much be the same how it is now as there's not much else worth picking up in that draft.

If they go into the national draft, clubs can pick whether or not they want to draft old or young depending on their needs. Since we will likely pick an older guy, that means the clubs like steins can pick an extra gun rookie or two since less teams will be taking rookies (they'll be taking the older experienced guys) so maybe this will help balance the comp?

Nige

I still reckon everyone wanting guys like Bontempelli and Aish should be forced to give every player over 24.

kilbluff1985

You could easily trade a top 5 pick for a couple best XV players that would improve your team even more and that airnt to old

Nige

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 23, 2014, 03:13:00 PM
You could easily trade a top 5 pick for a couple best XV players that would improve your team even more and that airnt to old
Nah KB, more important to use it on 18 year olds so that they can win 5 straight premierships from 2020-2024!  ;)

kilbluff1985

Quote from: NigeyS on August 23, 2014, 03:17:04 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 23, 2014, 03:13:00 PM
You could easily trade a top 5 pick for a couple best XV players that would improve your team even more and that airnt to old
Nah KB, more important to use it on 18 year olds so that they can win 5 straight premierships from 2020-2024!  ;)

Taking notes

Any more tips?

Nails

#beeninmoreprelimsthananycoachonFF
#knowwhatimdoing
#letmedoit
#number1coach2016201720182019

kilbluff1985

Quote from: Nails on August 23, 2014, 03:21:09 PM
#beeninmoreprelimsthananycoachonFF
#knowwhatimdoing
#letmedoit
#number1coach2016201720182019

Is rarely answering messages or voting a strategic move?

Nige

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 23, 2014, 03:19:20 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on August 23, 2014, 03:17:04 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 23, 2014, 03:13:00 PM
You could easily trade a top 5 pick for a couple best XV players that would improve your team even more and that airnt to old
Nah KB, more important to use it on 18 year olds so that they can win 5 straight premierships from 2020-2024!  ;)

Taking notes

Any more tips?
As soon as any players hit 25, delist them immediately so you got more picks to grab 18 year olds.  8)

Always put the C on you 90 avg 18 year old or you're pretty much tanking.

Avoid playing anyone in your XV that isn't <24

Memph, are you interested in taking over the Dinos in Euros? It's perfect for you. More kids than a playground.

Quote from: Nails on August 23, 2014, 03:21:09 PM
#beeninmoreprelimsthananycoachonFF
That's because you run retirement homes.

Vinny


Nails

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 23, 2014, 03:22:19 PM
Quote from: Nails on August 23, 2014, 03:21:09 PM
#beeninmoreprelimsthananycoachonFF
#knowwhatimdoing
#letmedoit
#number1coach2016201720182019

Is rarely answering messages or voting a strategic move?

I answered your message

HOURS ago

are you that flowering spastic ? look at your inbox omg

kilbluff1985

I said rarely are you spastic?

You said you had 122 unread messages

Ringo

This was never going to end well due to the differences of opinions and as Administrator need to ensure the evenness of the competition.

I am hearing the arguments of both Nails and Memph with their teams improving and adding youth will assist and at the same time need to ensure no lopsided contests.  Have spent some time examining the results of Giants and Steins over the year and Giants have the capabilities of producing some good scores and be competitive. They have 4 players averaging over 100 and ran the Badgers close when they had their best team on the park and scored over 1700 points.  Steins are really struggling though and has only one player averaging over 100 and have a highest score for the season of just over 1500 points.
So based on these facts Steins will need to either select a quality player with first pick or trade it for a quality player from other teams, Happy for Giants to select whoever as to for other teams as looking at the results all teams are capable of scoring more than 1700 points.




Nails

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 23, 2014, 03:30:05 PM
I said rarely are you spastic?

You said you had 122 unread messages

from the last 10 hours ;)

You try and run trade talks for 5 different teams. I can only reply to x amount every hour :o

Nige

New idea: Force Nails and Memph to take over the Swaggers and Falcons as they are and not make any trades and put their Giants and Steins into the pool instead. If they decline, they're no longer BXVs coaches.  ;)