Draft and Mini Trade for Relinquished Teams Players.

[Nige]

Damn, ended up with the second last pick in the second round.  :(

Should still get somebody of value and I don't think I'll trade the pick, was just hoping for one a bit earlier.

[SydneyRox]

Ready to pick now..... :P

[Nige]

Ready to pick now..... :P

[Justin Bieber]

Your problem Lez if you did not read the options properly prior to voting was spelled out that option 1 was for all to get 2 picks based on finishing order and option 2 being randomised for round 1 and then randomised for 9 teams in Round 2.

So where's the option of all teams get 2 picks, but from 3-16 teams are randomised in the pools like they are in the first round. Never had an option, so why make a vote which doesn't have all possible options?

E.g

Then Random Draws as follows:
Picks 19- 23 (Rams Bunnies Owls Breakers)
Picks 24 - 28 (Cruisers, Hawks, Dragons, Magic, Hurricanes  )
Picks 29 - 33 ( Hoods, Hedgehogs, Badgers, Werewolves, Leeches)

[kilbluff1985]

Lez you had pretty much no input while we were discussing it and now you want to complain ::) didn't see this coming at all lol

[Justin Bieber]

I was the one who brought up the idea so not sure if you are just being a dickhead or serious.

[Ringo]

During the discussion it was raised how to benefit the mid range teams and this was the option that was brought up and leaving the Top 8 without a pick and that is the basis of the option put out to vote. Was not my preferred as I said but am abiding by vote.  If you wanted 2 picks you should have voted for option 1 which imo was the fairest of all.

[Spite]

Yeah this way it will even out the teams as they get an extra depth player. It will be good for the competition in the long term!

[Justin Bieber]

During the discussion it was raised how to benefit the mid range teams and this was the option that was brought up and leaving the Top 8 without a pick and that is the basis of the option put out to vote. Was not my preferred as I said but am abiding by vote.  If you wanted 2 picks you should have voted for option 1 which imo was the fairest of all.

The problem with option A was that teams could deliberately lose in the finals (not sure why) to ensure a higher pick.

[LF]

During the discussion it was raised how to benefit the mid range teams and this was the option that was brought up and leaving the Top 8 without a pick and that is the basis of the option put out to vote. Was not my preferred as I said but am abiding by vote.  If you wanted 2 picks you should have voted for option 1 which imo was the fairest of all.

The problem with option A was that teams could deliberately lose in the finals (not sure why) to ensure a higher pick.

There are only 4 teams left and really who would deliberately lose now they are so close to the GF so they aren`t really getting a much higher pick anyway.

[Justin Bieber]

A team would tank to NOT make the GF? :o

[JBs-Hawks]

Have now heard it all :P

[Nige]

Have now heard it all :P

[Justin Bieber]

During the discussion it was raised how to benefit the mid range teams and this was the option that was brought up and leaving the Top 8 without a pick and that is the basis of the option put out to vote. Was not my preferred as I said but am abiding by vote.  If you wanted 2 picks you should have voted for option 1 which imo was the fairest of all.

The problem with option A was that teams could deliberately lose in the finals (not sure why) to ensure a higher pick.

There are only 4 teams left and really who would deliberately lose now they are so close to the GF so they aren`t really getting a much higher pick anyway.

Well isn't the bottom 10 teams still fighting for positions too??

[kilbluff1985]

During the discussion it was raised how to benefit the mid range teams and this was the option that was brought up and leaving the Top 8 without a pick and that is the basis of the option put out to vote. Was not my preferred as I said but am abiding by vote.  If you wanted 2 picks you should have voted for option 1 which imo was the fairest of all.

The problem with option A was that teams could deliberately lose in the finals (not sure why) to ensure a higher pick.

There are only 4 teams left and really who would deliberately lose now they are so close to the GF so they aren`t really getting a much higher pick anyway.

Well isn't the bottom 10 teams still fighting for positions too??

no, just bragging rights

see the draft thread http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,98155.0.html