Should I trade Shenton if Sub??

[ubeaut]

McVeigh,Swallow,Bartel,Simpson,Hurn,Birchall   (Bews,Jones)
Pendles,Beams,Rocky,Fyfe,Priddis,Barlow,JPK,Selwood  (Hartung,SHENTON)
Sandilands,Martin  (Mumford,King)
Danger,Boomer,Martin,Pavlich,Zorko,Buddy  (Kersten,Cameron)

2 trades 265K left.

Would u go Shenton(if sub BE 94) > Gray and leave 1 trade hopefully for Kersten/Cameron > DPP ruck cheapie
or keep Shenton and go Kersten,Cameron > Gray,DPP ruck ?

The 1st option leaves me the option of either saving a trade for injury OR getting a DPP ruck to swing Martin fwd if needed
2nd option gets Gray AND DPP ruck and gives more cover BUT leaves no trades for injury.

No league games this week.

[ubeaut]

bump

[Ringo]

As you have no league games I would sit unless as you say Shenton is sub and price may fall. I would even be tempted to do it anyway and switch Zorko to mid emergency and play Gray forward. Depends what your goal is.
As an aside Mummys last game against Dees 164 SC points

[Redbaron]

I would not trade. Who knows who gets injured this week or rested next. I would personally hope  Cameron plays a good game say 60 points and bumps his score up by 35 k then next week you could trade him to Gray  and maintain the dpp link. If Cameron is poor then either downgrade a ruck or downgrade any premo next week who is injured or rested ( this will happen) to get the extra 40 k needed to get Gray.

[Ringo]

Big decision now for you Ubuet with Shenton sub.

[Redbaron]

What did you do?

[ubeaut]

What did you do?

So glad I did NOTHING. I would be so screwed if I had traded Shenton and then all the carnage happened. I did take ur post into consideration and u were right! Who knows who'll get injured/suspended!! Cheers mate