WXV Trade Talk

[Ricochet]

really want to see the reason why N5 for Adams was rejected

[Holz]

are you saying 64 and 68 have actually failed or are they pending your vote and just not passed yet.

im abit confused on that one as 12/18 coaches passed it and you stated you agreed with the coaches decision which was 2/3 passed it and 1/3 rejected it therefore it passes right?

6-8 votes means trade fails unless I pass it, and agree that the trade should fail.

am I losing or winning too much apparently?

have no idea

[Nige]

are you saying 64 and 68 have actually failed or are they pending your vote and just not passed yet.

im abit confused on that one as 12/18 coaches passed it and you stated you agreed with the coaches decision which was 2/3 passed it and 1/3 rejected it therefore it passes right?

6-8 votes means trade fails unless I pass it, and agree that the trade should fail.

am I losing or winning too much apparently?

have no idea

Patience. Oss said he'd post the detailed results soon.

[Nige]

Wait... did Holz delete his post?

[meow meow]

really want to see the reason why N5 for Adams was rejected

[Jukes]

really want to see the reason why N5 for Adams was rejected

I was close to rejecting it but passed it, I though Adams was worth a bit less than N5 but didn't mind it enough to reject

[Toga]

Q and I didn't think any of the trades this week were so uneven they needed to be negged. Some came closer than others but in the end none seem to massively disadvantage anyone

[Vinny]

Just looking at the trades, none of them this week look neg worthy imo.

[elephants]

We had to go hard for Adams as a number of other clubs were keen on him too. Oh well, hopefully we can renegotiate.

[Jukes]

Can somebody please take pick 17 off us

Want good forward

[Memphistopheles]

Can somebody please take pick 17 off us

Want good forward

I thought you didn't have any picks left?

[Jukes]

Can somebody please take pick 17 off us

Want good forward

I thought you didn't have any picks left?

I'm not throwing pick 17 in as a deal sweetener it's too valuable :3

[My Chumps]

Just looking at the trades, none of them this week look neg worthy imo.

Agreed. Would people please flowering understand that they should only neg a trade if it is incredibly one sided?

[Jay]

Just looking at the trades, none of them this week look neg worthy imo.

Agreed. Would people please flowering understand that they should only neg a trade if it is incredibly one sided?

+1, it's getting ridiculous.

[JBs-Hawks]

Think there are 6 teams that have something against holz trades? :P

Personally i think its good when Holz loses a trade as it brings him closer to the pack