Main Menu

WXV Trade Talk

Started by Ricochet, August 12, 2014, 11:23:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

Quote from: JROO8 on October 05, 2014, 11:19:20 AM
I can't believe the Rocky trade failed.
Oh well, I'm not upset I didn't gain much from it, at all.

Just the most valuable player in the competition ;)


RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Holz on October 05, 2014, 11:11:08 AM
He will get dpp next year I'm pretty confident. He won't keep it past a year though and that's why it is a fair trade. Walters has shown he is a 90 average forward and when bennell loses dpp he needs to turn into a 105-110 mid at least for it to be fair. I just don't understandhow a 30 year old 88 back and a 27 79 average forward buys the better version of bennell (trealor). Yet a 90 average forward can't get bennell.

I wouldn't think to trade Walters for jjk + duffield and I'm going for a flag. Would give bennel up in a second for trealor.

I've been through this conversation before, and I feel like its a mute one now

We are well and truly aware that giving up Treloar was huge, and he will be light years ahead of what we got, BUT we lacked defenders and forwards, and having to play players OOP, or rookie spuds, was costing us even more than what we lose by giving up Treloar, so as crazy as it appears on the surface, that trade was extremely beneficial for our teams balance and overall scoring



Holz

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on October 05, 2014, 11:22:12 AM
Quote from: Holz on October 05, 2014, 11:11:08 AM
He will get dpp next year I'm pretty confident. He won't keep it past a year though and that's why it is a fair trade. Walters has shown he is a 90 average forward and when bennell loses dpp he needs to turn into a 105-110 mid at least for it to be fair. I just don't understandhow a 30 year old 88 back and a 27 79 average forward buys the better version of bennell (trealor). Yet a 90 average forward can't get bennell.

I wouldn't think to trade Walters for jjk + duffield and I'm going for a flag. Would give bennel up in a second for trealor.

I've been through this conversation before, and I feel like its a mute one now

We are well and truly aware that giving up Treloar was huge, and he will be light years ahead of what we got, BUT we lacked defenders and forwards, and having to play players OOP, or rookie spuds, was costing us even more than what we lose by giving up Treloar, so as crazy as it appears on the surface, that trade was extremely beneficial for our teams balance and overall scoring

Sorry to bring it up but I just don't get how that passes and ours fails.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Holz on October 05, 2014, 11:24:45 AM
Sorry to bring it up but I just don't get how that passes and ours fails.

No probs, and I agree with you. Don't see how it failed personally myself.

Oh well, perhaps we can try and rejig it?

ONE OF Bennell or Will Hoskin Elliott are on the table, but only for a starting forward

Jroo

Quote from: Holz on October 05, 2014, 11:21:31 AM
Quote from: JROO8 on October 05, 2014, 11:19:20 AM
I can't believe the Rocky trade failed.
Oh well, I'm not upset I didn't gain much from it, at all.

Just the most valuable player in the competition ;)
Yeah but you did get a bit back ;)


When does trading open up again? Are we allowed to post deals in the other thread, as yet?

ossie85

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on October 05, 2014, 11:01:36 AM
Quote from: ossie85 on October 05, 2014, 10:23:30 AM
Trade 59
Beijing give: Matt Rosa
New York give: Aaron Black + Pick #39 ID

Votes against: 2

Coach comments: Feel Rosa/Black are evenish, 39 too much

Admin comments: Probably would've passed... just.... But unfortunately Pick 39 not with New York

Final verdict: REJECTED

Os, I am assuming you have simply rejected this because we don't have 39 now?

Only 2 coaches neg'd it, so clearly the majority agree with us in that Rosa and Black are not evenish - Rosa is better, with a better SC average, which is why we added the pick

We have Pick 41, so I will just resub the trade using 41 instead of 39

In terms of the Walters/Bennell deal, it's disappointing to see it get knocked back. I think its a more than fair deal too, echoing AK's previous comments, especially how a 90 avg forward is prob more important than a 100 avg mid

I hope Bennell does get DPP, otherwise as AK said you have to put up a 90 avg forward for him, or he stays at New York

Yeah, only rejected because Pick 39

kilbluff1985

Ossie just so you can see our logic behind the Gibbs trade

Port are going to be a very strong side for next few years and we think Carlton will go backwards before they go forwards Gibbs had a good year this year who knows if he will back it up and he will probably get more attention

as you assumed we felt we were getting a bonus pick for not really losing much from our best xv and with Ceglar + Big Boy we don't really need McBeany

Jukes

Quote from: JROO8 on October 05, 2014, 11:19:20 AM
I can't believe the Rocky trade failed.
Oh well, I'm not upset I didn't gain much from it, at all.

Good news at least is that you still have the chance to offload Sidey to me :3

Boomz

Sorry to all messaging me am currently stranded in Korea as got robbed so will be a while before I can reply.

Master Q

Quote from: Boomz on October 05, 2014, 07:24:17 PM
Sorry to all messaging me am currently stranded in Korea as got robbed so will be a while before I can reply.
South...?  :-X

ossie85

Quote from: Boomz on October 05, 2014, 07:24:17 PM
Sorry to all messaging me am currently stranded in Korea as got robbed so will be a while before I can reply.

Reckon JB should pay you back. Adds spice to the Tokyo-Seoul rivalry

Seriously, hope all is well

Ricochet

Just posting our current side. Still very keen to trade and see offers.
Anyone you like, hit me or Ele up

Mullett, Webster, Savage, CPearce
(BSinclair, DBuckley, Hartigan, Ellis-Yolmen, Stratton, DTalia, Cheney, SEdwards, CGiles, ZDawson, JKelly)

Greene, Bastinac, Gaff, Trengove
Masten, Wellingham
(Horlin-Smith , NRobertson, ZWilliams, Michie, Dunell, Sheridan, Bail, RKnight, Helbig, Ross, Kerridge, Sumner)

Nicholls
(Warnock, Hampson, Nankervis, Renouf)

Podsiadly, Murdoch, Griffiths, Johnston
(Apeness, Dell'Olio, McCarthy, BJohnson)

Nails


Purple 77

I don't mind that midfield, heaps of potential. Rucks pretty solid too!



Whatever happened to that Podsiadly auction?  :P

Ricochet

couldn't let him go back then because we were too close to the minimum cap :(
I think we're a bit better for points now tho