Main Menu

WXV Trade Talk

Started by Ricochet, August 12, 2014, 11:23:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Nige

Sam Mitchell is available to anybody that wants a solid mid. Still very much capable of scoring well. Would like a defender in return.

kilbluff1985

Quote from: Nige on September 25, 2014, 02:06:05 PM
McGlynn is available to anybody that wants a solid mid. Still very much capable of scoring well. Would like a defender in return.

Purple 77

Heart skip a beat every time I see a *new* post symbol here  :-X gots me some team changing trades I is.

Nige

Quote from: Purple 77 on September 25, 2014, 03:57:10 PM
Heart skip a beat every time I see a *new* post symbol here  :-X gots me some team changing trades I is.
Soz.  :P

Blame HP though.

Purple 77

Btw all, I am looking to trade one (maybe 2) of Wells, Montagna (pending), Conca and Langford for a defender. Sweets can be added if that is the case.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Nige on September 24, 2014, 04:02:23 PM
Can we have a shorter time frame for voting on trades?  :P

kilbluff1985

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on September 25, 2014, 04:24:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on September 24, 2014, 04:02:23 PM
Can we have a shorter time frame for voting on trades?  :P

maybe you should read Ringo's post cut him some slack

ossie85

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on September 25, 2014, 04:24:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on September 24, 2014, 04:02:23 PM
Can we have a shorter time frame for voting on trades?  :P

Not hugely inclined to do that, a week seems reasonable for people to come on and vote - particularly when we reach Christmas/New Year periods.

Have plenty of time guys :)




Just a thought to make trading (in the future) a bit more 'real life'.

Pretty sure I know the response to this idea, but will float it anyway....

If a player is traded in the AFL, they HAVE to be traded in WXV

Just think it would add all sorts of crazy, making inactive coaches more active, and result in some pretty spectacular deals.


Purple 77

Nige to trade Beams... I'd love to see that happen  :P

Nige

Quote from: ossie85 on September 25, 2014, 04:28:43 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on September 25, 2014, 04:24:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on September 24, 2014, 04:02:23 PM
Can we have a shorter time frame for voting on trades?  :P

Not hugely inclined to do that, a week seems reasonable for people to come on and vote - particularly when we reach Christmas/New Year periods.

Have plenty of time guys :)




Just a thought to make trading (in the future) a bit more 'real life'.

Pretty sure I know the response to this idea, but will float it anyway....

If a player is traded in the AFL, they HAVE to be traded in WXV

Just think it would add all sorts of crazy, making inactive coaches more active, and result in some pretty spectacular deals.
Was kidding, hence the :P face.  ;)

Not a fan of that crazy idea Oss, I think Purps nailed the reasoning.  ;D

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 25, 2014, 04:27:11 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on September 25, 2014, 04:24:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on September 24, 2014, 04:02:23 PM
Can we have a shorter time frame for voting on trades?  :P

maybe you should read Ringo's post cut him some slack

Seriously KB? Of course I know what Ringo said

Obviously if someone has something that requires their attention and needs more time that is completely fine

The comment about making the time frame shorter is beyond this week mate

If someone says they need more time, then fine, but most weeks it should be able to happen a lot quicker than a week

CrowsFan

Just out of interest why haven't you done this as 2 separate trades? You have made one deal with Mexico City, and one with Berlin. Berlin and Mexico City don't trade anything to each other...

Or is this your sneaky way of ensuring one more yes vote to try and get it through? :P

Nige

Quote from: Honey Badger on September 25, 2014, 04:35:01 PM
Or is this your sneaky way of ensuring one more yes vote to try and get it through? :P
That's probably it.

Still slightly baffled on the idea of trading arguably one's best player and the best player in the comp as well to the biggest premiership threat.  :o

Holz

Quote from: Honey Badger on September 25, 2014, 04:35:01 PM
Just out of interest why haven't you done this as 2 separate trades? You have made one deal with Mexico City, and one with Berlin. Berlin and Mexico City don't trade anything to each other...

Or is this your sneaky way of ensuring one more yes vote to try and get it through? :P

because if I don't get hurn in the rocky than i cant afford to lose murphy as my backline will be in trouble next year. My trades have a habit of getting rejected so need either to both pass or both fail.

kilbluff1985