Main Menu

WXV Trade Talk

Started by Ricochet, August 12, 2014, 11:23:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Nige

Quote from: MajorLazer on September 11, 2014, 04:27:33 PM
Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

Why don't we all just trade with Cairo then? Our trades always go through.

#NoCairoNoTrade

kilbluff1985

and the Gibbs trade is funny cause some people thought Seoul was laughing all the way to the bank with that one and so did we

elephants


Holz

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 11, 2014, 04:28:38 PM
Quote from: Holzman on September 11, 2014, 04:23:11 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 11, 2014, 04:18:59 PM
sorry RD but i think the Bennell and Hoskin-Elliot trade was right to get rejected

both will be forwards you could have gotten much more

Bennell will be a mid long term. New York is doing a good job and having a long term plan while also picking up a premium forward next year. This isnt a 1 year comp

a premium forward?

Walters averaged 78 and Green averaged 66

so who is the premium forward?

If people value walters as a 78 forward to be honest they shouldnt be allowed to vote. Do abit of research and see if he is worth a 78 forward.

this is why Mckenzie trade got passed. This was the worst trade for the worlds this year and probably one of the worst trades I have seen in any XV comp I have played in 3 years.

Nige

Quote from: elephants on September 11, 2014, 04:31:15 PM
So much bants!
This is pretty much how you know it's the off-season.  8)

Memphistopheles

Quote from: Vinny on September 11, 2014, 04:26:37 PM
People negging nothing trades is a flowering joke.

This is what I have an issue with too.

Fair enough if you have a valid reason to neg a trade but because it's a 'nothing trade' is ridiculous.

kilbluff1985

yeah well the Bennell one is one of the worst i have seen

Toga


Holz

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 11, 2014, 04:33:34 PM
yeah well the Bennell one is one of the worst i have seen

would love a logical and statics based reason for that.

because I can mount a very strong case that I overpaid.

Toga


Vinny

Quote from: Memphistopheles on September 11, 2014, 04:33:00 PM
Quote from: Vinny on September 11, 2014, 04:26:37 PM
People negging nothing trades is a flowering joke.

This is what I have an issue with too.

Fair enough if you have a valid reason to neg a trade but because it's a 'nothing trade' is ridiculous.
Mm, nothing wrong with the system, people just seem to be abusing it.

"Irritated because it was a nothing trade.''

flower off.

RaisyDaisy

So our SJ trade got neg'd, because people thought we paid too much offering Picks 8 and 21 I think it was, but Pacific offering picks 2, 4 and 20 for Barlow is fine and gets passed

LOL

Memphistopheles

Quote from: Holzman on September 11, 2014, 04:34:31 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 11, 2014, 04:33:34 PM
yeah well the Bennell one is one of the worst i have seen

would love a logical and statics based reason for that.

because I can mount a very strong case that I overpaid.

Remove WHE from one side and Pick 57 from the other and the trade is fine imo.

Bennell and WHE will both be premo guns. Walters is a gun but Black is not and I doubt he ever will be.

Jed Anderson > Templeton and TMac > Pick 10 imo as well but the promise of who your could get with Pick 10 and how they could develop is enough that I think if I had a vote (I don't being an assistant) I would maybe just pass that one.

RaisyDaisy

We gave Pick 10 for McKenzie because that pick allowed us to get Duncan

Nige

So many subjective posts, I can't even.

To accurately reflect my thoughts on all of this, here's my Michael Jordan.