WXV Trade Talk

[Hellopplz]

I think PNL push the boundaries Torp. We do have Reindeers imported from the North Pole as our mascots.

[upthemaidens]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

McCarthy was taken with Pick#15 last year, don't you think a pre-season and a year of development is worth an increase in picks?  Longer for Guthrie is more than fair, considering the lack of Rucks and the amount of Mids in the player pool.

Not for pick 9 no way, maybe another pick in the 30's instead

Guthrie gets games at the cats and Longer (when Hickey plays) does not at St Kilda.

Once again McCarthy was taken with #15 last year, why would a weaker pick be fair?
Longer is a Ruckman, he will take longer(pardon the pun) to be a high scoring fantasy player, but has potential to be a premium Ruck.
  Guthrie tagged most of the year, 80avg. Midfielders are a dime a dozen. This trade works because both teams improve their scoring output and/or future prospects.

[AaronKirk]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

McCarthy was taken with Pick#15 last year, don't you think a pre-season and a year of development is worth an increase in picks?  Longer for Guthrie is more than fair, considering the lack of Rucks and the amount of Mids in the player pool.

Not for pick 9 no way, maybe another pick in the 30's instead

Guthrie gets games at the cats and Longer (when Hickey plays) does not at St Kilda.

Once again McCarthy was taken with #15 last year, why would a weaker pick be fair?
Longer is a Ruckman, he will take longer(pardon the pun) to be a high scoring fantasy player, but has potential to be a premium Ruck.
  Guthrie tagged most of the year, 80avg. Midfielders are a dime a dozen. This trade works because both teams improve their scoring output and/or future prospects.

Ok then. agree to disagree.

[kilbluff1985]

I think PNL push the boundaries Torp. We do have Reindeers imported from the North Pole as our mascots.

The North Pole is actually real?

#mindblown

[upthemaidens]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

McCarthy was taken with Pick#15 last year, don't you think a pre-season and a year of development is worth an increase in picks?  Longer for Guthrie is more than fair, considering the lack of Rucks and the amount of Mids in the player pool.

Not for pick 9 no way, maybe another pick in the 30's instead

Guthrie gets games at the cats and Longer (when Hickey plays) does not at St Kilda.

Once again McCarthy was taken with #15 last year, why would a weaker pick be fair?
Longer is a Ruckman, he will take longer(pardon the pun) to be a high scoring fantasy player, but has potential to be a premium Ruck.
  Guthrie tagged most of the year, 80avg. Midfielders are a dime a dozen. This trade works because both teams improve their scoring output and/or future prospects.

Ok then. agree to disagree.

In three years when McCarthys a premium Forward, you'll be falling over yourself to be buying him.
  Trust me this was the minimum we were going to take and it was a borderline decision as is. Could of easily passed on it.

[Hellopplz]

I think PNL push the boundaries Torp. We do have Reindeers imported from the North Pole as our mascots.

The North Pole is actually real?

#mindblown

From the same people who brought you the fire-breathing Polar Bears ;).

[Holz]

alot of passion in the offseason, the great thing is all will be revealed next year when the season starts.

cant wait for the draft, interesting to see how good these picks are.

[AaronKirk]

I love it, opinionated debate in good spirit is very healthy for the competition.

[meow meow]

Lacking ruck depth? Want Majak Daw? Jack Hannath? Luke Lowden? Tom Downie? Max King?

[JBs-Hawks]

Considering floating Conigilio up for trade if anyone has some offers?

[upthemaidens]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

Oh yeah and by the way if he's worth that much, I'm sure we will be able to sell Guthrie to you.  Just throw up an offer.  ;D

[AaronKirk]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

Oh yeah and by the way if he's worth that much, I'm sure we will be able to sell Guthrie to you.  Just throw up an offer.  ;D

It is opinion based.

I don't see how Guthrie fits in our team structure, and the fact you rate McCarthy similar to current premos is ridiculous

We gave up pick 8 and a solid young player for Stevie J, we got pick 10 for McKenzie which we used with a slightly better ruck than Longer (Tom Nicholls) to get Mitch Duncan.

Basically says a proven youngster (Duncan) is worth the same as a one-game unproven youngster (McCarthy) which I completely disagree with.

Based on your theory than Joe Daniher should be worth 2 top 5 picks,he will be an A grader but but he hasn't shown the full potential yet, therefore he was traded by London to Moscow for less. It is all relative

So back to relative trades and opinions this trade was passed, ok, then how was our trade with Dublin with Bennell for Walters and a pick blocked? Still puzzles me but anyway proceed.

I think I will just pass every trade from now on instead of vigilant and thoughtful (if thats how everyone think WXV will be better)

[upthemaidens]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

Oh yeah and by the way if he's worth that much, I'm sure we will be able to sell Guthrie to you.  Just throw up an offer.  ;D

It is opinion based.

I don't see how Guthrie fits in our team structure, and the fact you rate McCarthy similar to current premos is ridiculous

We gave up pick 8 and a solid young player for Stevie J, we got pick 10 for McKenzie which we used with a slightly better ruck than Longer (Tom Nicholls) to get Mitch Duncan.

Basically says a proven youngster (Duncan) is worth the same as a one-game unproven youngster (McCarthy) which I completely disagree with.

Based on your theory than Joe Daniher should be worth 2 top 5 picks,he will be an A grader but but he hasn't shown the full potential yet, therefore he was traded by London to Moscow for less. It is all relative

So back to relative trades and opinions this trade was passed, ok, then how was our trade with Dublin with Bennell for Walters and a pick blocked? Still puzzles me but anyway proceed.

I think I will just pass every trade from now on instead of vigilant and thoughtful (if thats how everyone think WXV will be better)

It shows you paid way too much for Johnson, that's all that says.. ::)  A 17 game a year player, with what? 1-2 injury plagued years left..

[AaronKirk]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

Oh yeah and by the way if he's worth that much, I'm sure we will be able to sell Guthrie to you.  Just throw up an offer.  ;D

It is opinion based.

I don't see how Guthrie fits in our team structure, and the fact you rate McCarthy similar to current premos is ridiculous

We gave up pick 8 and a solid young player for Stevie J, we got pick 10 for McKenzie which we used with a slightly better ruck than Longer (Tom Nicholls) to get Mitch Duncan.

Basically says a proven youngster (Duncan) is worth the same as a one-game unproven youngster (McCarthy) which I completely disagree with.

Based on your theory than Joe Daniher should be worth 2 top 5 picks,he will be an A grader but but he hasn't shown the full potential yet, therefore he was traded by London to Moscow for less. It is all relative

So back to relative trades and opinions this trade was passed, ok, then how was our trade with Dublin with Bennell for Walters and a pick blocked? Still puzzles me but anyway proceed.

I think I will just pass every trade from now on instead of vigilant and thoughtful (if thats how everyone think WXV will be better)

It shows you paid way too much for Johnson, that's all that says.. ::)  A 17 game a year player, with what? 1-2 injury plagued years left..

Averaged 107 this year, 116 the year before- completely disagree.

[upthemaidens]

I will.

Trade 63
Cape Town give: Cameron Guthrie + NAT #9 + NAT #34
Pacific give: Billy Longer + Cameron McCarthy + NAT #59

Pick 9 is surely worth a lot more than second string ruck and an unproven player in McCarthy

Heck, Guthrie is worth more than Longer and McCarthy.

Oh yeah and by the way if he's worth that much, I'm sure we will be able to sell Guthrie to you.  Just throw up an offer.  ;D

It is opinion based.

I don't see how Guthrie fits in our team structure, and the fact you rate McCarthy similar to current premos is ridiculous

We gave up pick 8 and a solid young player for Stevie J, we got pick 10 for McKenzie which we used with a slightly better ruck than Longer (Tom Nicholls) to get Mitch Duncan.

Basically says a proven youngster (Duncan) is worth the same as a one-game unproven youngster (McCarthy) which I completely disagree with.

Based on your theory than Joe Daniher should be worth 2 top 5 picks,he will be an A grader but but he hasn't shown the full potential yet, therefore he was traded by London to Moscow for less. It is all relative

So back to relative trades and opinions this trade was passed, ok, then how was our trade with Dublin with Bennell for Walters and a pick blocked? Still puzzles me but anyway proceed.

I think I will just pass every trade from now on instead of vigilant and thoughtful (if thats how everyone think WXV will be better)

It shows you paid way too much for Johnson, that's all that says.. ::)  A 17 game a year player, with what? 1-2 injury plagued years left..

Averaged 107 this year, 116 the year before- completely disagree.

He's 31yo, he avg 107 in the 17 games he played(75% of the season) 116avg the year before. So on your own evidence  Johnson is on decline...
  Heath Scotland scored well two years ago,  how much his he worth now?