Trade Suggestion (Please)

[The_Joker]

I'm undecided on what to do, 3 trades left $205k in the bank - I know i have to trade Hibberd (This week i don't, can't drop from 2nd place in leagues can afford a loss)

My concern is no Def backup in Finals, late outs would hurt.

Backs - McVeigh, Swallow, Mitchell, Bob Murphy, HIBBERD, Hanley  - (Georgiou/Bews)

Mids - Pendles, Selwood, SJ, M Murphy, Fyfe, Goddard, Griffin, Beams (Dunstan/Acres)

FWDS, & Rucks are fine.

Thoughts?

Any suggestions?

[shaker]

Hibberd to Malceski for me because even keeping Hibberd on the bench he not going to provide you cover until the 3rd week of the finals you would think  ;)

[The_Joker]

Hibberd to Malceski for me because even keeping Hibberd on the bench he not going to provide you cover until the 3rd week of the finals you would think  ;)

Real good point, thanks for the suggestion.

[Ramus]

Hibberd to Malceski for me because even keeping Hibberd on the bench he not going to provide you cover until the 3rd week of the finals you would think  ;)

Yep, good advice right there.

I need to offload him too, but not sure who to yet, I can't afford Malceski, but if I could he would be my choice.

[Jroo]

I'd look to only use one trade, and Hibberd to Malceski looks like the best one.

[The_Joker]

Hibberd to Malceski for me because even keeping Hibberd on the bench he not going to provide you cover until the 3rd week of the finals you would think  ;)

Yep, good advice right there.

I need to offload him too, but not sure who to yet, I can't afford Malceski, but if I could he would be my choice.

He has a BE of 133 this week, so looks as though he will be cheaper next week then he is now.

[The_Joker]

I'd look to only use one trade, and Hibberd to Malceski looks like the best one.

It's looking that way, should have traded him a few weeks back! -  Hibberd has now made it to the never again list along with Cyril, he seems to always do a hammy each year.

[diamw90]

Suss hibb to Simpson possibly... Might not get U the massive scores but with walker out is getting a lot of ball... Also malceski seems to be slightly struggling with shaw out...

[Woppa15]

Suss hibb to Simpson possibly... Might not get U the massive scores but with walker out is getting a lot of ball... Also malceski seems to be slightly struggling with shaw out...

Shaw has been in full training and only has to pass a fitness test at training today (Thursday), expected to be available for selection.

[The_Joker]

Suss hibb to Simpson possibly... Might not get U the massive scores but with walker out is getting a lot of ball... Also malceski seems to be slightly struggling with shaw out...

Shaw has been in full training and only has to pass a fitness test at training today (Thursday), expected to be available for selection.

Do you think Malceski's score's have declined since Shaw has been out, with possible improvement when he returns? Malceski has a great run home.

[Woppa15]

Suss hibb to Simpson possibly... Might not get U the massive scores but with walker out is getting a lot of ball... Also malceski seems to be slightly struggling with shaw out...

Shaw has been in full training and only has to pass a fitness test at training today (Thursday), expected to be available for selection.

Do you think Malceski's score's have declined since Shaw has been out, with possible improvement when he returns? Malceski has a great run home.

I haven't seen too many Swans games so couldn't say to be honest. Just didn't want you to discount him because of Shaw's absence only to find out he will most likely be back this week. In theory Shaw's return would enable malceski to get more midfield time but like I said haven't seen too many Swans games so unsure of where he's been playing anyway.

[Woppa15]

I'm not sure that Shaw's absence has effected Maceski anyway, he's still scored two tonnes and a 90 in the last 4 games....

[HappyDEZ]

I'm with diamw90. Simpson $437K ave. 97.9 BE = 46 vs. Malceski $538K ave. 103.4 BE = 133. It's never a good idea to skimp but I would make an exception in this case.

[H1bb3i2d]

Yeah I agree with one trade, but I'd probably get Simpson for $100k cheaper!!