Acceptable VC Loophole score over Rocky

Started by Titalicous, July 30, 2014, 09:44:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Titalicous

I'm going to go with Simpson for a VC, but do I really bother with Rocky, SJ and JPK in my side?

But still a 140 out of Simpson and I'd be happy to take it, last week I couldn't use the loophole but everyone should be able to this week.

GoLions

I'd probably consider 200, although would still back my boy in to beat it

pommyadam

130+ for me
I'd back Rocky to get 130 (as in my captains thread) so I'd take anything over that
Dees aren't that leaky for the opposition (a nice high-possession keep-ball gameplan helps there) even if it is unsuccessful for ladder purposes

Alka

After being burned by taking Stevies 145 last week, I'm not sure I'll take anything short of 190...

rebird

130, I don't expect rocky to post two consecutive monster scores

fertalong

I'll take anything over 130. I have Simpson VC as well.
Hanley will get the tag ahead of rocky which means he is likely to run free. I think rocky should go in the vicinity of 140+, but a safe 130 is the smart choice.

Hagebear


colmullet

Got the same decision, it's tough, you would think Melbourne would put a fair bit of work into Rocky this week

GoLions

Quote from: colmullet on July 31, 2014, 11:17:23 PM
Got the same decision, it's tough, you would think Melbourne would put a fair bit of work into Rocky this week
I hope they do. Then Hanley will go nuts again, and Rocky will still do well cause he is a tackling machine

Hagebear

Still don't mind knowing I've got 248 banked away!!!

pommyadam

#10
Dees statistics:
Conceded over 125 on 5 occassions since the bye (and is their average since then) - conceded average of 4 tons per game in that time
Over 130s since bye are to: Goddard (rd13, 157), Barlow (rd16, 134), SJ (rd17, 130)
3 round average of 125 - 5 tons per game average
5 round average of 125 - 4.5 tons per game average
TO THE LEADING MID (who we're all expecting Rocky to be)

It's nice having points on the board
But if you're chancing Rocky, then do take note that you're expected gain is around 5-10 points

kilbluff1985

Simpson was on 112 with 10 min left then did nothing lol

Hagebear

Quote from: pommyadam on August 01, 2014, 12:13:38 AM
Dees statistics:
Conceded over 125 on 5 occassions since the bye (and is their average since then) - conceded average of 4 tons per game in that time
Over 130s since bye are to: Goddard (rd13, 157), Barlow (rd16, 134), SJ (rd17, 130)
3 round average of 125 - 5 tons per game average
5 round average of 125 - 4.5 tons per game average
TO THE LEADING MID (who we're all expecting Rocky to be)

It's nice having points on the board
But if you're chancing Rocky, then do take note that you're expected gain is around 5-10 points

Almost makes sense to bank the 124 just incase.

Rusty00

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 01, 2014, 12:22:55 AM
Simpson was on 112 with 10 min left then did nothing lol
I'm fairly sure he didn't touch it after he kicked that goal

henry

Quote from: Hagebear on August 01, 2014, 01:50:11 AM
Quote from: pommyadam on August 01, 2014, 12:13:38 AM
Dees statistics:
Conceded over 125 on 5 occassions since the bye (and is their average since then) - conceded average of 4 tons per game in that time
Over 130s since bye are to: Goddard (rd13, 157), Barlow (rd16, 134), SJ (rd17, 130)
3 round average of 125 - 5 tons per game average
5 round average of 125 - 4.5 tons per game average
TO THE LEADING MID (who we're all expecting Rocky to be)

It's nice having points on the board
But if you're chancing Rocky, then do take note that you're expected gain is around 5-10 points

Almost makes sense to bank the 124 just incase.
Yep, it's what I'm doing. If you are focusing on league and think your team should be stronger than your opponents then go this safe way, if you think you might need to take a risk then go rocky.