Jaensch vs Suckling

[quinny88]

Can't split them! Both so hot and cold

[Grazz]

Would like to  well cant say what id like to do with Jaensch but id like to do it twice.

[Rowan1812]

None. Mitchell draw coming up isnt good in terms of who will tag him (crowley, mccaffer etc) so will not score well to finish out the year. Waste of a trade.

[enzedder]

I've got the same decision to make.
Suckling is the one I'm probably going to cut...based on last couple of games and Jaensch scoring more 90/100s...but as prices and averages indicate there is nothing between them. Pick one and hope for the best.
Never thought I'd have Suckling this long but Mitchell is too good to pass up.

[JBs-Hawks]

im ousting suckling!

But to go with Mitchell + Zorko or Simpson + Lecras

[quinny88]

None. Mitchell draw coming up isnt good in terms of who will tag him (crowley, mccaffer etc) so will not score well to finish out the year. Waste of a trade.

Disagree, Mitchell is a ball magnet and is tagged every week. Confident he will average 100 for te rest of the year where as suckling and jaensch seem more likely to average 70-80 for the rest of the year

[Bully]

Keep Suckling I reckon, he's the type who you could loophole from time to time.

[Grazz]

im ousting suckling!

But to go with Mitchell + Zorko or Simpson + Lecras

Simpson has had a role change since Judds been back, Zorko's scores have lifted since Redden going. I prefer Mitch/Zorko mate.

[RaisyDaisy]

Keep Suckling I reckon, he's the type who you could loophole from time to time.

He cant loophole him with Jones and Georgiou as bench cover (Refer to his RMT)

I said Suckling in your RMT thread

Personally, I am passing on Smitch. No doubt he is a great pick, but he has only had 1 really good score all year IMO, and coupled with the fact that Hibberd, Simpson and Enright are my only sideway options (Cant afford to do Jaensch to Smitch in 1 trade) I don't see the point, especially being low on trades

Sorry to slightly derail your thread, but having seen your team I think Suckers to SMitch is the way to go for you

[Marcon]

Asking myself the exact same question. I also have Birchall which is making me lean towards Suckling.

[quinny88]

Keep Suckling I reckon, he's the type who you could loophole from time to time.

He cant loophole him with Jones and Georgiou as bench cover (Refer to his RMT)

I said Suckling in your RMT thread

Personally, I am passing on Smitch. No doubt he is a great pick, but he has only had 1 really good score all year IMO, and coupled with the fact that Hibberd, Simpson and Enright are my only sideway options (Cant afford to do Jaensch to Smitch in 1 trade) I don't see the point, especially being low on trades

Sorry to slightly derail your thread, but having seen your team I think Suckers to SMitch is the way to go for you

True, but he is still averaging over 100 if you take out his 9 when he was injured.
Definitely leaning towards suckling to mitch

[H1bb3i2d]

Keep Suckling I reckon, he's the type who you could loophole from time to time.

He cant loophole him with Jones and Georgiou as bench cover (Refer to his RMT)

I said Suckling in your RMT thread

Personally, I am passing on Smitch. No doubt he is a great pick, but he has only had 1 really good score all year IMO, and coupled with the fact that Hibberd, Simpson and Enright are my only sideway options (Cant afford to do Jaensch to Smitch in 1 trade) I don't see the point, especially being low on trades

Sorry to slightly derail your thread, but having seen your team I think Suckers to SMitch is the way to go for you

True, but he is still averaging over 100 if you take out his 9 when he was injured.
Definitely leaning towards suckling to mitch

Don't get all the tag talk myself. He's been a champion for years now, and it's not like he's suddenly become the number one tagged player at the Hawks - he's dealt with attention most of his career. Don't see why only now his average would drop below 100 because of a tag...

*think I quoted the wrong comment but it's too late to change it now.

[Bully]

Mitchell will be outscoring most defenders from now on, it will be about 20 points extra on the likes of Suckers & Jaensch. So that's an extra 120 points for the rest of the season. Is it worth a trade? Depends how low you are, I've got 2 left but will bring him in regardless, it's certainly risky business but I feel better having him in my side, he's a guaranteed 80+ with a huge ceiling, at 413k he's simply too good to pass up.

[woofy]

Asking myself the exact same question. I also have Birchall which is making me lean towards Suckling.

Exactly who I have and need to get rid of at least one of them. Suckers > Mitchell for me.

[Slick5]

I'm in the exact same position and leaning towards Suckling, not a big Jaensch fan but Adelaide have a better draw coming up with a lot of home games.