2015 lock ins.

[kilbluff1985]

no KPF for me next year besides Hogan

[nrich102]

I wouldn't go picking Zorko. He will have significantly lessidfield time next year, with Rich and the likes coming back.

Bartel will probably get fwd status i think

Bartel for def/mid/fwd next year hahaha

[Holz]

Lance Franklin. When you consider his first 8 rounds his real average is probably closer to 115

I suspect most players look really good if you decide to ignore when they aren't...  ;D
Franklin is a gun but I'm not upset that I haven't had him this year, Zorko has been all the ups and downs I've needed for one team and at the end of it they've been pretty much even. Parker I regret passing on. Buddy by no means a lock in for me.

More importantly is why they wernt. Wasn't used to the Sydney structure and no tippett forced him to play kpp and not get possesisions up the ground. Also meant a lot more attention to him.

[GCSkiwi]

Lance Franklin. When you consider his first 8 rounds his real average is probably closer to 115

I suspect most players look really good if you decide to ignore when they aren't...  ;D
Franklin is a gun but I'm not upset that I haven't had him this year, Zorko has been all the ups and downs I've needed for one team and at the end of it they've been pretty much even. Parker I regret passing on. Buddy by no means a lock in for me.

More importantly is why they wernt. Wasn't used to the Sydney structure and no tippett forced him to play kpp and not get possesisions up the ground. Also meant a lot more attention to him.

I'm sure that had a part to play but that also seems like a convenient excuse, if you look at his scoring he managed to get a 104, 130 and 96 in the opening 8 rounds, even if his truly crap scores didn't make a return. I'm not saying I wouldn't put him in my team, just that he's not a definite lock in - will depend on his price for me.

[Mailman the 2nd]

Lance Franklin. When you consider his first 8 rounds his real average is probably closer to 115

I suspect most players look really good if you decide to ignore when they aren't...  ;D
Franklin is a gun but I'm not upset that I haven't had him this year, Zorko has been all the ups and downs I've needed for one team and at the end of it they've been pretty much even. Parker I regret passing on. Buddy by no means a lock in for me.

More importantly is why they wernt. Wasn't used to the Sydney structure and no tippett forced him to play kpp and not get possesisions up the ground. Also meant a lot more attention to him.

I'm sure that had a part to play but that also seems like a convenient excuse, if you look at his scoring he managed to get a 104, 130 and 96 in the opening 8 rounds, even if his truly crap scores didn't make a return. I'm not saying I wouldn't put him in my team, just that he's not a definite lock in - will depend on his price for me.

Its a convenient excuse because its true. Sydney got demolished in the first couple of rounds.

Just look at the teams he did poorly against: GWS, Melbourne, Collingwood and North. He loves playing vs. those teams normally and he only got like 5-6 possies and like at max 1 goal.

He then goes on a tear for the rest of the season only going sub 95 3 times. Its really a no brainer IMO. Will be well underpriced

[GoLions]

I wouldn't go picking Zorko. He will have significantly lessidfield time next year, with Rich and the likes coming back.

Agree

I would say Hanley will keep his, Hodge as well, but who would gain it?

Not sure if Hanley will keep his. I think he'll lose it next year, but will play off half-back most of the year with Rich and Redden back, plus our younger kids getting more mid time as well. Then he'll regain his DPP in 2016.

[GCSkiwi]

Its a convenient excuse because its true. Sydney got demolished in the first couple of rounds.

Just look at the teams he did poorly against: GWS, Melbourne, Collingwood and North. He loves playing vs. those teams normally and he only got like 5-6 possies and like at max 1 goal.

He then goes on a tear for the rest of the season only going sub 95 3 times. Its really a no brainer IMO. Will be well underpriced

He's currently averaging 100, so he's not going to be that underpriced given I would say he's a 110 player when on form. For me there's also other considerations to put in there, being the rollercoaster performances (similar to Boomer in that respect) and the number of games you get from him - his beast average so far is 115 from a season he played 16 games. Like I said, he's not in the "no" pile, just not in the "definitely yes" pile.

[kilbluff1985]

Ziebell a chance for forward status?

[quinny88]

Can't read what SC will come up with as far as Dpp goes
All of my backs and forwards will depend on that. Rucks so hard to pick too so the only thing I know is that
my midfield will read: Ablett, Pendlebury, Rockliff, Fyfe.
Will take a large chunk of the salary cap but I don't care, the rest of my team can fit around that

[Bully]

Caddy's form of late may be worth a look, seems to have broken the shackles a bit.

[Ricochet]

Especially with SJ, Jimmy and Kelly on the way out.

[Jackross10]

Might look at danger and Selwood. No one picks Selly at the start so may be pod. Danger will be underpriced. Can go 120 and not many will get seeing as he will be mid.

[Southstorm]

Caddy burned me last year, but I'm going to go around again.

And for the record, I'm saying "last year" because my supercoach season is well and truly over.

[Spanner221]

Speaking of breakout players if Jack Newnes gets def status I will lock him in down back.

[Mark]

Lachie Neale & R.Gray