2015 lock ins.

Started by Jackross10, July 13, 2014, 08:09:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

Michael Walters will be cheap.

Mat0369


kilbluff1985


david17

Chris Moreland from the Recruit ;)

Mat0369


joshua98

One name I really like the look of is brad crouch. If he plays the remaining games he doesn't qualify got a discount and will average close to the 100 mark this year. Would he be worth it as a pure mid at 530k next year?

Big Mac

Quote from: joshua98 on July 16, 2014, 09:25:19 PM
One name I really like the look of is brad crouch. If he plays the remaining games he doesn't qualify got a discount and will average close to the 100 mark this year. Would he be worth it as a pure mid at 530k next year?

Would be too expensive to use as a stepping stone so you would be starting him with the expectation he will finish in the top 10-12 mids. Yes he is good and will probably be a star one day but I don't that day will come for a few more years. Leave the speculative picks to the forwards/backs/rucks mate

Dayze

Quote from: Big  Mac on July 16, 2014, 09:29:49 PM
Quote from: joshua98 on July 16, 2014, 09:25:19 PM
One name I really like the look of is brad crouch. If he plays the remaining games he doesn't qualify got a discount and will average close to the 100 mark this year. Would he be worth it as a pure mid at 530k next year?

Would be too expensive to use as a stepping stone so you would be starting him with the expectation he will finish in the top 10-12 mids. Yes he is good and will probably be a star one day but I don't that day will come for a few more years. Leave the speculative picks to the forwards/backs/rucks mate
Its true and a pity about supercoach.
Not a lot of reward in risking a midfield POD.
So many safer options its best to leave the risks to the other lines.

Mr.Witt

Do we know for sure that it is 10 games that is the mark for a reduction?

Rusty00

Quote from: Mr.Witt on July 17, 2014, 11:02:32 AM
Do we know for sure that it is 10 games that is the mark for a reduction?
I'm not sure there is an official number of games for a reduction. I think it's a case by case basis at the discretion of those who run the game.

kilbluff1985

Watson wont get a discount they are not that nice

Holz

the more i read about swanny the more I want to pick him next year.

boy he will be cheap.

but maybe he deserves to be. only 100 average before the bye and I think he was fully fit than.

Ricochet

Quote from: Mr.Witt on July 17, 2014, 11:02:32 AM
Do we know for sure that it is 10 games that is the mark for a reduction?

Pete J VirtualSports ‏@petejank  18m
@Ricochetthis typically it's 8 or less, but can vary a bit up and down the scale..

kilbluff1985

look at Beams played 7 games last year i think averaged 102 we still payed 500k for him

Mr.Witt

Quote from: Ricochet on July 17, 2014, 03:27:18 PM
Quote from: Mr.Witt on July 17, 2014, 11:02:32 AM
Do we know for sure that it is 10 games that is the mark for a reduction?

Pete J VirtualSports ‏@petejank  18m
@Ricochetthis typically it's 8 or less, but can vary a bit up and down the scale..
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on July 17, 2014, 03:28:48 PM
look at Beams played 7 games last year i think averaged 102 we still payed 500k for him

So really you have to play a very little amount of games to get scaled down.