done

[Rowdie1284]

looks pretty good, similar to my team, just dunno about Podsiadly in forward line, maybe gumbleton or someone instead. 8.5/10

[starz]

where did the marking down come from apart from pods.

[alman]

Gonna be honest, lots of teams looking almost identical so wouldn't worry too much about being copied (probably wouldn't have posted either way if was worried about that).

9/10 as Rockliff and Waters starting - should be a strong side just make sure you manage your trades well  :)

PS As Rowdie said Pods not best option (Brown coming back from injury faster than expected and when he does Pods is back to being rookie listed - possibly only play 2 games bar injury to other player)

[Rowdie1284]

Just because of a few different midfielders, no big deal, i'd only rate my team a 9/10 at best thou, good luck  :)

[starz]

team 1
goddard enright shaw hodge kennely malceski hunt
maguire slagvani

abblett pendles mitchell trengrove martin barlow
banner bastanic

sandi hille
warnock lobbe

rewoldt okkefe pavlich franklin hall dangerfield rockliff
hitchcock pods

team 2
goddard enright shaw hodge  malceski hunt waters
maguire slagvani

abblett pendles mitchell cooney martin barlow
banner bastanic

sandi hille
warnock lobbe

rewoldt okkefe pavlich hall dangerfield medhurst rockliff
hitchcock pods

i know the team structure will be totally out if i go team 1 but i think that all those three rookies are almost essential. it could be a technique that could help me go well but i just don't know. that why i need your opinions????

[starz]

team 1
goddard enright shaw hodge kennely malceski hunt
maguire slagvani

abblett pendles mitchell trengrove martin barlow
banner bastanic

sandi hille
warnock lobbe

rewoldt okkefe pavlich franklin hall dangerfield rockliff
hitchcock pods

team 2
goddard enright shaw hodge  malceski hunt waters
maguire slagvani

abblett pendles mitchell cooney martin barlow
banner bastanic

sandi hille
warnock lobbe

rewoldt okkefe pavlich hall dangerfield medhurst rockliff
hitchcock pods

i know the team structure will be totally out if i go team 1 but i think that all those three rookies are almost essential. it could be a technique that could help me go well but i just don't know. that why i need your opinions????

[starz]

i think i will setlle with this as i like watching everyone in this team.
i could get medhurst but i don't like the way he plays.

goddard enright shaw hodge kennely malceski hunt
maguire salgvani

abblett pendles mitchell trengrove martin barlow
banner bastanic

sandilands hille
warnock lobbe

roo okeefe pavlich franklin hall dangerfield rockliff
hitchcock gumbleton

who is going to join me

[CrowsFan]

join you for what? copying your team?
you say it is a gun/rookie stratergy, but its not really...
kennelly, malceski, hunt, hall, dangerfield. they are neither guns or rookies, most of them are good pickups, but not really sticking with your strategy there

[Adsspinner]

I AGREE WITH THE CROW MAN !!!!!!!

TRY A NEW GAME

[starz]

i was clearly just trying to get people to look at my team i only said that beacaue of the 3 rookie midds

[Adsspinner]

Comp is heatin up !!! thats all

Look at mine its posted

Jetta is a must

Nic Nat for Hille

Constructive !!! cheers good luck

[alman]

Comp is heatin up !!! thats all

Look at mine its posted

Jetta is a must

Nic Nat for Hille

Constructive !!! cheers good luck

Just curious why those options? Is there reason or you just prefer them?

As Crowman said not really Gun/Rookie??

Backs - strong choices that shouldn't let you down, nothing really unique. Good depth though.

Mids - Good premiums and rookes, personally don't like 3 starting rookies in mid as is not the area to skimp on - whether the better rookies are there or not!

Rucks - Some usual choices, hope Hille doesn't let you down. Big men jumping up and down on a knee that had a recent op can lead to trouble!

Forwards - All good choices, usual risk with Rockliff starting.

9/10 - cant fault much apart from Rockliff - look for some more unique choices I reckon  :)

[starz]

alman if your still logged on i could go:
kenely to waters, trengove to cooney, franklin to medders.

but i would much rather watch kennely trengove and franklin
your thoughts???

[alman]

Watch as in on tv?

I like what you've suggested:

Waters big potential (although I think Kennelly is a great choice this season).

Cooney good option, I prefer Griffen as has had a great nab and maybe set to make jump to premium status!?

Medhurst awesome nab, probably won't be as good as Franklin. However after last season I wouldn't pick Franklin again. Is an x-factor but just too inconsistent! Also have Dangerfield or Ziebell at that price range.

[starz]

yeh i think i might just leave it at that nad hope that the three rookie mids pays off.
imo franklin had a poor season because of his poor pre season. with interupted pre season hopefully he can get bac to his best