JPK v Barlow

Started by smoothM24, June 06, 2014, 05:16:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

smoothM24

JPK has some ripper form on his side and a relatively easy run, barlow has an easy run also. I would be more inclined to say barlow is a more proven Fantasy scorer. What do people think. (Cant afford Rocky)

jvalles69


SydneyRox

JPK by a mile.

You should be looking to get Barlow IMO as well. But straight picking JPK will easily outscore him.

smoothM24

Conflicting Results haha

jvalles69

Quote from: SydneyRox on June 06, 2014, 05:19:58 PM
JPK by a mile.

You should be looking to get Barlow IMO as well. But straight picking JPK will easily outscore him.

Barlow will average over 110 for the rest of the year, JPK will go under that.

j959

Quote from: smoothM24 on June 06, 2014, 05:38:23 PM
Conflicting Results haha
I'm a Swans supporter so no bias when I say ... go Barlow mate - you've missed the boat on JPK.

despite JPK's lower BE, reckon Barlow is gonna offer you more value in the long-term and again despite JPK's ripper form of late

good luck!  ;)

smoothM24

Cheers mate, its done haha.  I am a docker support so it suits me just fine haha

SydneyRox

Quote from: jvalles69 on June 06, 2014, 05:40:04 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on June 06, 2014, 05:19:58 PM
JPK by a mile.

You should be looking to get Barlow IMO as well. But straight picking JPK will easily outscore him.

Barlow will average over 110 for the rest of the year, JPK will go under that.

LOL - based on what? JPK has already avg 112 for the year, and hasnt gone under 100 in the last 6. his worst 3 games at the start when the whole team was down.

If you are saying that barlow represents value since he is $50k cheaper then i might agree, but he wont score more points between now and end of season.

Quote from: smoothM24 on June 06, 2014, 05:46:43 PM
Cheers mate, its done haha.  I am a docker support so it suits me just fine haha

LOL - why were you even asking!!! :)


smoothM24


LOL - why were you even asking!!! :)
[/quote]

hahaha still wanna make a good decision !! dont need any more reason to watch the dockers , Dt makes other teams relevant haha

HBTD22

Quote from: SydneyRox on June 06, 2014, 05:47:27 PM
LOL - based on what? JPK has already avg 112 for the year, and hasnt gone under 100 in the last 6. his worst 3 games at the start when the whole team was down.

If you are saying that barlow represents value since he is $50k cheaper then i might agree, but he wont score more points between now and end of season.

Based on the fact that he's never averaged more than 110? Or the fact that he's had ONE season average over 100 (barely I might add)? And the fact that historically he's horribly inconsistent as a DT player. Much more suited to SC. Take the Sydney glasses off.

SydneyRox

Quote from: HBTD22 on June 06, 2014, 05:54:10 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on June 06, 2014, 05:47:27 PM
LOL - based on what? JPK has already avg 112 for the year, and hasnt gone under 100 in the last 6. his worst 3 games at the start when the whole team was down.

If you are saying that barlow represents value since he is $50k cheaper then i might agree, but he wont score more points between now and end of season.

Based on the fact that he's never averaged more than 110? Or the fact that he's had ONE season average over 100 (barely I might add)? And the fact that historically he's horribly inconsistent as a DT player. Much more suited to SC. Take the Sydney glasses off.

you know who else has never avg 110+ in a year..... Barlow....  :P




Mailman the 2nd

Quote from: HBTD22 on June 06, 2014, 05:54:10 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on June 06, 2014, 05:47:27 PM
LOL - based on what? JPK has already avg 112 for the year, and hasnt gone under 100 in the last 6. his worst 3 games at the start when the whole team was down.

If you are saying that barlow represents value since he is $50k cheaper then i might agree, but he wont score more points between now and end of season.

Based on the fact that he's never averaged more than 110? Or the fact that he's had ONE season average over 100 (barely I might add)? And the fact that historically he's horribly inconsistent as a DT player. Much more suited to SC. Take the Sydney glasses off.

Or maybe its because, unlike previous years he's probably the 2nd best player in the 2014 season and hence is scoring very well this season.

Just maybe?

Jazzoskies

Barlow, thats my 2cents worth

Mailman the 2nd

Fremantle's draw is pretty kind now on in so I'd probably go Barlow as well but I don't think it'll make a ton of difference

jvalles69

Quote from: SydneyRox on June 06, 2014, 05:47:27 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 06, 2014, 05:40:04 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on June 06, 2014, 05:19:58 PM
JPK by a mile.

You should be looking to get Barlow IMO as well. But straight picking JPK will easily outscore him.

Barlow will average over 110 for the rest of the year, JPK will go under that.

LOL - based on what? JPK has already avg 112 for the year, and hasnt gone under 100 in the last 6. his worst 3 games at the start when the whole team was down.

If you are saying that barlow represents value since he is $50k cheaper then i might agree, but he wont score more points between now and end of season.

Quote from: smoothM24 on June 06, 2014, 05:46:43 PM
Cheers mate, its done haha.  I am a docker support so it suits me just fine haha

LOL - why were you even asking!!! :)

Based on previous years when I've had him, one of the most frustrating players DT wise to have in your team, its all fine and dandy when he's pumping out big scores but just wait for the showerepile he unleashes before the end of the season.