Trade advice - what rookie/s to get

[ubeaut]

McVEIGH,SWALLOW,WALKER,HURN,Suckling,Langdon  (Langford,Cutler)

ABLETT,PENDLES,JPK,BEAMS,WATSON,PRIDDIS,Polec,Tyson  (Acres,Hartung)

SANDILANDS,MUMFORD  (Derikx,King)

DANGER,MARTIN,PAVLICH,ZORKO,Higgins,Cameron  (Ambrose,Impey)

450 K in bank. Kept Tyson last week to milk some more cash,Polec should score well vs Dees,Saints then they both get upgraded.

Thinking Langford > Bews still concerned about JS? Then there's Acres when is he back - 6 weeks or is it less now?

Otherwise if Ambrose not named > Shenton/Lennon 2 downgrades  then spend the cash over coming 2 weeks.

Ideas?  :)

[ubeaut]

I could do 2 upgrades - but there are 3 rookies on the bubble and I'm struggling to see how I'm gonna make cash otherwise. I could do 1 up 1 down..

[Slammer]

I reckon Bews JS is fairly good. He played a tagging role last week against L.Thomas and did well.
He is also named in back pocket this week

[ubeaut]

anyone? :-\

[Ringo]

I would look at Downgrading Ambrose and upgrading Polec. Polec has a B/e of 123 which he probably will not achieve even allowing for the opposition.
Hawks and pies have reasonable draws over the next 3 weeks so both Langford and Langdon could go up in price.

[ubeaut]

I would look at Downgrading Ambrose and upgrading Polec. Polec has a B/e of 123 which he probably will not achieve even allowing for the opposition.
Hawks and pies have reasonable draws over the next 3 weeks so both Langford and Langdon could go up in price.

Cheers Ringo struggling here - I have thought of this option esp. if Ambrose not named. But if he is he has more cash to make BE 21 - and getting Shenton/Lennon would only get me 30K..

Are u dead against a Langford/Cutler > Bews trade?

[Ringo]

Cutler to Bews may be sound as Cutler may be sub again. Langford will make his B/e imo.

Another option may be Acres to Bews via Langdon but not give as much cash as Cutler.

[felsty]

Would definitely do Polec > Bews and then Ambrose > Shenton if not named.

If Ambrose is named Polec > Shenton, then have a good think about Langdon > Bews, otherwise I would throw an upgrade in their somewhere. Langdon > ?

[ubeaut]

Would definitely do Polec > Bews and then Ambrose > Shenton if not named.

If Ambrose is named Polec > Shenton, then have a good think about Langdon > Bews, otherwise I would throw an upgrade in their somewhere. Langdon > ?

Cheers - another option/s but not sure about playing Shenton/Acres/Hartung @M8