Langdon and Langford

Started by ubeaut, May 28, 2014, 11:55:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ubeaut

Like to hear people's thoughts/plans for these 2. Considering keeping 1 for bench cover.

Langford is a tagger which restricts his scoring,but has better JS long term. He may make a bit more cash but not much.

Langdon has shown he can score well,and has a good draw in coming weeks. Is Fasolo really affecting his scores or is this co-incidence? He has peaked in price for now,but another 90-100 and could also make a bit more.

I also still have Suckling who may benefit from injuries at Hawks plus now having games under his belt after long lay off from injury.

I could keep him and trade the other 2 instead.


GoLions

Langdon is gone for me this week, Langford will either go next week if I have the cash to get rid of him over KK, or stay as bench cover for the season

Bully

Think i might keep Langford, I have Cutler as well so will make him my final upgrade.

shaker

Last 2 rookies on the field for me maybe Langdon might go this week with his higher B/E he would have to get a big score this week to make much more cash

vmac66

Plan to have Langford as bench cover , and going to try and keep Langdon until Mitchell gets back . He will be a great pod as everyone plans to gave a full team by then . 

Ramus

Have Langford, Cutler, Georgiou in defence and Langdon in the midfield.

Current thinking is downgrade Langford to Bews and keep Cutler for bench cover, put some cash in the bank for next week. Then trade Langdon to a midfield premium.


woofy

keeping Langford on bench as I'm a bit iffy on Bews js. Will have to keep Langdon this week as I have Polec, Robertson, Fasolo and Lloyd to worry about.

tommy10

I think I'll keep Langdon D6 and Langford D7 for now. Need to generate cash and then upgrade to a premium in my fwd line.

ubeaut

Cheers guys. I have Cutler also who could make more cash but again not that much. This week depends if Bews is named.

Who is better long term cover tho - Langdon or Langford or is it flip a coin?

ubeaut

Also are people who are getting rid of Langdon scared off by Fasolo coming back or other factors? I mean the pies play Saints,Dees,Dogs in coming rounds he could score well - until last week people were talking about having Langdon as D6 - 1 bad week and it's see ya later!

Ramus

I'm just in a real hurry to finish off my upgrades so Langford and Langdon would be gone this week if it made sense for me!

MontyJnr

I'm running out of cash for upgrades, so I'm really reluctant to keep either of these guys. Unfortunately I was forced to trade Cutler to Bews last week to avoid a donut, otherwise I would've done Langford to Bews this week. I'm hoping Shaun Edwards gets named and tears apart the Dreamtime game to provide another defender downgrade option.

enzedder

Quote from: ubeaut on May 28, 2014, 11:55:03 AM
Like to hear people's thoughts/plans for these 2. Considering keeping 1 for bench cover.

Langford is a tagger which restricts his scoring,but has better JS long term. He may make a bit more cash but not much.

Langdon has shown he can score well,and has a good draw in coming weeks. Is Fasolo really affecting his scores or is this co-incidence? He has peaked in price for now,but another 90-100 and could also make a bit more.

I also still have Suckling who may benefit from injuries at Hawks plus now having games under his belt after long lay off from injury.

I could keep him and trade the other 2 instead.
I have Langdon and Langford too. Depends on personal circumstance but I feel there's more upside to trading out Langford if ridding yourself of just the one. Of course if you need the extra 100k then Langdon is your tradebait.
I'm probably going to dump Langford. My thinking is he hasn't scored as well in comparison and his BE is such that he is unlikely to make much more...maybe 10-15k...and could plateau and be done with another 40-50 type score.
Langdon has a higher BE this week but with an average score he'll get it and there's also a chance he could score 100+ v St.Kilda.
Langdon has more value as a field player and has dual position status. Whilst I could trade both I don't think I will. I figure I'll give Langdon another week and hope for the best. If he kills it he'll stay for a bit...if he goes average he could be done and there's a chance I could afford Hibberd in a straight swap which I can't do this week as I'm committing to trading in Parker.

Vinny

Langdon gone this week.

Langford either goes in the next couple or stays as bench cover for the season.

dickitch

With Collingwood and Hawks playing Saints and Giants respectively I want to hold on to both for at least one more week