Poll: Jaensch, Swallow or Bartel

Started by Carn, May 27, 2014, 11:16:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Carn

Laidler and Langdon have topped out.
Laidler is my weakest link.
But I have wanted Bartel/Swallow all year...

Current team:
McVeigh Simpson Hibberd Suckling Langdon Laidler (Tippett Cutler)
Ablett Pendlebury Selwood Watson Beams SJ Fyfe Rocky (Acres Hartung)
Sandy Goldy (Derickx Currie)
Dangerfield Martin Parker Roughead Zorko Fasolo (Shenton Cameron)

Help me guys?

nperera95


Carn

Quote from: nperera95 on May 27, 2014, 11:18:48 PM
Bartel > Swallow > Jaensch

Yes that is pretty clear.
But you have to factor in that I will have to carry Laidler for the next few weeks if go for those top 2. So you have to factor in the $$$.

nperera95

Can't really do much.. Guess you gonna have to wait and let your other rookies rise in price and then downgrade them to generate cash. Could get rid of Derickixx for a no name rookie but then you would have no cover in the ruck department. Could do the same in the fwd with Fasolo but that means you need one of either Shenton or Cameron to play each week

Carn

Quote from: nperera95 on May 27, 2014, 11:35:34 PM
Can't really do much.. Guess you gonna have to wait and let your other rookies rise in price and then downgrade them to generate cash. Could get rid of Derickixx for a no name rookie but then you would have no cover in the ruck department. Could do the same in the fwd with Fasolo but that means you need one of either Shenton or Cameron to play each week

I have traded hard to max out my mids and this is where all my cash is. Paying the price now with only cheap rookies in the bench. Was hoping Fas would make some more cash.

kilbluff1985

put it this way, which would you rather

Langdon + Jaensch
Laidler + Bartel
Laidler + Swallow

i like the 1st option best with SJ back Bartel wont get as much mid time

Carn

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 28, 2014, 12:35:09 AM
put it this way, which would you rather

Langdon + Jaensch
Laidler + Bartel
Laidler + Swallow

i like the 1st option best with SJ back Bartel wont get as much mid time

Bit worried about jaensch's JS and role when henderson comes back.

tor01doc

Bartel and Swallow are almost certainly top 6.

Jaensch - not so.

Aim high. I would try and maximise cash generation to afford one or both of them

Fasolo to Shenton to fund Swallow's recruitment.

Carn

Quote from: tor01doc on May 28, 2014, 07:54:59 AM
Bartel and Swallow are almost certainly top 6.

Jaensch - not so.

Aim high. I would try and maximise cash generation to afford one or both of them

Fasolo to Shenton to fund Swallow's recruitment.

And play Shenton at F6?

tor01doc

I would for now. He is worth getting for the cash which will allow you the better premiums in the long run and most of us are in league rather than overall battles.

Carn

#10
Quote from: tor01doc on May 28, 2014, 03:37:03 PM
I would for now. He is worth getting for the cash which will allow you the better premiums in the long run and most of us are in league rather than overall battles.

I am all about rank. Surely upgrading the lowest scoring player is a priority?

Laidler + Bartel = 50+105 =155
Langdon + Jaensch = 70 + 90 = 160

Pretty close in my opinion. Do you agree?

H1bb3i2d

Quote from: Carn on May 28, 2014, 08:35:14 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 28, 2014, 03:37:03 PM
I would for now. He is worth getting for the cash which will allow you the better premiums in the long run and most of us are in league rather than overall battles.

I am all about rank. Surely upgrading the lowest scoring player is a priority?

Laidler + Bartel = 50+105 =155
Langdon + Jaensch = 70 + 90 = 160

Pretty close in my opinion. Do you agree?

Yeah IMO Langdon & Jaensch is definitely a winner for short-term points, if Fas and Langdon are your last to uprgrade you're doing great.