Analysis of Top 50 teams

[Hoggyz_a_legend]

I have updated the OP with the Round 11 document.

A few notable differences between the two week:

28 more C.Cameron
27 more selwood
17 more bews
8 more martin
7 more pendlebury

4 less fyfe
4 less zorko
5 less watson
18 less tyson

Why people are trading out Fyfe and Watson is WAY beyond me.

Another thing i noticed while looking at all of the teams, was the fact that quite a lot still had 2+ rookies on field. And only a few weren't Polec or Tyson, who could be bench keepers.

So imo, a lot of these teams will fall off in the coming weeks.

PS. I dropped from 84th to 177th with a score of 1756 :(

[Vinny]

Nice work Hodgy.

It's a shame the thread doesn't get much traffic here, I reckon it's best if it goes P&T.

Fyfe and Watson is interesting.

If Cameron gets dropped that's going to hurt people especially if they already have Ambrose as well.

Even though I got a shower rank it gives me some confidence knowin my team is more complete than some.

[Ricochet]

flower yeh nice work man amazing work

Teams would have sideways traded Watson and Fyfe because they had the bye.

[Deadly6]

Teams would have sideways traded Watson and Fyfe because they had the bye.


Yeah, some people just play to try and win one of the bye rounds

[SC God]

you are analysing the new top 50 teams buddy meaning that the top 50 has changed and there are different teams in there with different players

[Hoggyz_a_legend]

Yeah, there is 10 different teams in the Top 50. Sideways trading premos should only be done once you have no rookies on the ground (or if injured/suspended). Very last resort until later in the season imo.

[Ricochet]

interesting that Goddard is only in a handful of teams after being so cheap

[trezlek]

Burn those premo trades boys.... Burn them all :)

[ossie85]

interesting that Goddard is only in a handful of teams after being so cheap

he is cheap, but is he really going to give you regular 120+ scores? That's what you need when bringing mids in

[Ricochet]

interesting that Goddard is only in a handful of teams after being so cheap

he is cheap, but is he really going to give you regular 120+ scores? That's what you need when bringing mids in

Very true but he is averaging 118 without his sub affected game, has the scoring history, and in a team that racks up high possession totals while controlling the ball.

[SydneyRox]

Yeah, there is 10 different teams in the Top 50. Sideways trading premos should only be done once you have no rookies on the ground (or if injured/suspended). Very last resort until later in the season imo.

Love your work Hoggy!

So just to clarify I think what SC God was implying.

The +ve and -ve movements you noted are they based on the same 50 teams as last week or the new top 50?

If its just this weeks Top 50, it means some movements may be simply teams moving in/out of your analysis group

[ReverseTorp]

interesting that Goddard is only in a handful of teams after being so cheap

he is cheap, but is he really going to give you regular 120+ scores? That's what you need when bringing mids in

Very true but he is averaging 118 without his sub affected game, has the scoring history, and in a team that racks up high possession totals while controlling the ball.

I agree with above however as a bombers supporter I have noticed that Goddard and Watson play a fair bit up forward especially with Carlisle looking like a fish out of water. The more forward time he gets the less his possession count. Although all that would mean nothing if he kicked 2-3 a game and racked up 25 touches with his elite kick and high DE.

[Jroo]

you are analysing the new top 50 teams buddy meaning that the top 50 has changed and there are different teams in there with different players

Yeah that's what I was thinking.
Great stuff Hoggyz.

[Big Mac]

Thanks Hoggy - Interesting that only 3 people picked up Lennon - Better for me if Cameron gets dropped I guess!  :D

[Rusty00]

Yeah, there is 10 different teams in the Top 50. Sideways trading premos should only be done once you have no rookies on the ground (or if injured/suspended). Very last resort until later in the season imo.

If they needed to sideways trade to get 18 on the field then i think it was acceptable given playing less than 18 would have been a massive blow to overall chances.