Round 10 - Giants v Tigers - Saturday May 24th - Spotless Stadium

Started by Ringo, May 19, 2014, 09:29:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Vinny

FULL TIME IN SYDNEY
GWS 5.11.41 - Richmond 24.10.154

Giants:
5 Dylan Shiel 128
17 Adam Treloar 101
8 Callan Ward 95
3 Stephen Coniglio 91
10 Devon Smith 85
38 Stephen Gilham 68
9 Tom Scully 64
46 Dylan Addison 63
31 Jacob Townsend 61
20 Adam Tomlinson 60
33 Will Hoskin-Elliott 59
6 Lachlan Whitfield 58
2 Curtly Hampton 56
7 Rhys Palmer 56
40 Adam Kennedy 52
35 Aidan Corr 44
41 Shane Mumford 39
23 Heath Shaw 33
26 Jonathan Giles 25
12 Jonathon Patton 19
18 Jeremy Cameron 17
22 Joshua Kelly 0
TOTAL 1274

Tigers:
8 Jack Riewoldt 181
19 Matt Thomas 138
5 Brandon Ellis 137
4 Dustin Martin 129
3 Brett Deledio 118
25 Troy Chaplin 95
30 Reece Conca 94
14 Bachar Houli 93
9 Trent Cotchin 92
29 Ty Vickery 90
16 Shaun Hampson 82
18 Alex Rance 81
41 Nathan Foley 78
10 Shane Edwards 72
24 Ben Griffiths 71
6 Shaun Grigg 71
36 Matt McDonough 64
35 Ben Lennon 63
7 Matt Dea 60
2 Dylan Grimes 39
38 Steven Morris 32
23 Daniel Jackson 17
TOTAL 1897

ossie85


AaronKirk


Fid

Good come back by cotch...

1/4 time 2 points

for a total score of 92


Jroo

Quote from: ossie85 on May 24, 2014, 04:33:39 PM
Im not sure how Ward got 95, but thank you!
I know what a joke.
At least Cotch got a bit of the ball after quarter time.
I'm pretty happy with the 92, which should get scaled up. They missed two of his disposals in the first quarter.

Bones Bombers


LaHug

YAY ELLIS! So annoyed with him last week (brought him in for AF and SC... whoops!) but was solid this week.

Vinny


frogjumper

Quote from: JROO8 on May 24, 2014, 04:37:10 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on May 24, 2014, 04:33:39 PM
Im not sure how Ward got 95, but thank you!
I know what a joke.
At least Cotch got a bit of the ball after quarter time.
I'm pretty happy with the 92, which should get scaled up. They missed two of his disposals in the first quarter.
12 contested possessions at 83%. 7 clearances, 5 tackles, 4 1%s, 5 I50's
Pretty clear why he got 95

GoLions

Why do people have to compare DT to SC scores? When looking at someone's SC score, completely ignore what they got in DT, as they're scoring systems are different. I honestly don't get people sometimes.

Bully


Bones Bombers

Quote from: GoLions16 on May 24, 2014, 04:41:09 PM
Why do people have to compare DT to SC scores? When looking at someone's SC score, completely ignore what they got in DT, as they're scoring systems are different. I honestly don't get people sometimes.
Well when deciding wether to bring in a player its worth noting.
Might bring them in for one comp and not the other.
Is that OK with you?

Ricochet


GoLions

Quote from: Bones Bombers on May 24, 2014, 05:08:03 PM
Quote from: GoLions16 on May 24, 2014, 04:41:09 PM
Why do people have to compare DT to SC scores? When looking at someone's SC score, completely ignore what they got in DT, as they're scoring systems are different. I honestly don't get people sometimes.
Well when deciding wether to bring in a player its worth noting.
Might bring them in for one comp and not the other.
Is that OK with you?
I don't really see how bringing players into your team is relevant to what I said. I'm saying that if someone scores 50 in DT and 100 in SC, don't complain about how they managed to get such a high SC score. Similarly, if they get 100 in DT, and only 50 in SC, don't complain about how they were "robbed" and should've scored much more.

LaHug

Definitely just a misunderstanding, lads. See where you're both coming from. Tone is hard to detect so I'm just stepping in as a third party to make sure we don't get feisty :)