Round 8 Progressive Scores

Mr.Craig · May 09, 2014, 11:04:42 PM

611/7.

Flame · May 09, 2014, 11:08:24 PM

514/6

TomK · May 09, 2014, 11:32:16 PM

554/6. Very happy with that. Was only expecting 500 at least.

colmullet · May 09, 2014, 11:34:19 PM

289/3 with 2 rookies is a great little start

kilbluff1985 · May 09, 2014, 11:38:05 PM

355 4 played

LF · May 09, 2014, 11:43:14 PM

532/6
Unfortunately I have Rioli who I had planned to trade during byes but he was going so well I had decided to hold him has to go now tho :(

Noz · May 10, 2014, 12:20:32 AM

354/4

Derikx, McVeigh, Birchall and Langford

Pretty happy with the start

Money · May 10, 2014, 01:41:53 AM

537/7 looks like I'm a bit behind the 8 ball at the moment, was hoping for 550-600 but Suckling and Gunston were pathetic...

RookieDTer · May 10, 2014, 01:53:34 AM

573/6 - not bad, considering I had Suckling's 57.

Shout-out to the rest, Rookie Langford coming back in for 91, McVeigh dominating with 119, Parker very lively with 121, and very cheap Hallahan chipping in with 79 were the true studs... Special mention to Franklin who scored 30 above his season average to register 106 - doesn't make up for the absolute dysmal scores I've copped since bringing him in though.

I have 19, so, hopefully Suckling is dropped and I'm effectively 516/5.

XEllis, Shaw 70
Langdon 75
Heppel (C) 120*2 = 240
Scooter 90
Polec 90
Fyfe 105
RObertson 70
Buckley 60
Cox 85
Sandi 95
Zorko 93
Nick ROo 100
Ambrose 60

Would give me a respectable 1,749/18... All depends on my gamble of Heppel & Fyfe v Montagna & Hooker (against forum advice :()

Chrisso1 · May 10, 2014, 02:00:15 AM

705/9

Not a good start but am at my highest rank ever (by far) 15th overall. Spent the night with some non-DT friends and they didn't understand why I was cheering for players from opposite teams :P

henry · May 10, 2014, 10:14:37 AM

661/7 for me. Very happy with that, can't really be upset about suckling since everyone has him.

GoLions · May 10, 2014, 11:06:34 AM

467/5

McVeigh, Birchall, Suckling, Langford, Parker

Would've liked more from Birchall and Suckers, especially considering how well they were going at qtr time.

Dale S · May 10, 2014, 11:17:49 AM

270/4. Laidler,Suckling and Diercx average but only got Ambrose as my only rookie to come so should get 1500 which ill settle for with only playing 16.

pommyadam · May 10, 2014, 12:05:08 PM

183/3
Hallahan, Gunston and Suckers

another 15 to come

HBTD22 · May 10, 2014, 01:14:59 PM

Quote from: pommyadam on May 10, 2014, 12:05:08 PM
183/3
Hallahan, Gunston and Suckers

another 15 to come

576/7. Shaw and Suckling the let downs. Got 13 to come so hopefully Shaw and Suckling's scores get discarded but I just know they won't be the worst ones. ::)