ROUND EIGHT 2014 TEAM SUBMISSION THREAD

Started by BB67th, May 08, 2014, 05:01:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SydneyRox

#15
Team Name: Vietnam Vipers
Captain: Mark Hutchings
Vice Captain Dom Tyson
EME C/VC:  Jake Melksham

DEF1: Player - Nick Haynes (10)
DEF2: Player - Josh Bruce (80)
DEF3: Player - Jono O'Rourke (DNP)
DEF4: Player -

MID1: Player - Jake Melksham (92)
MID2: Player - Matt Jones (98)
MID3: Player - Stephen Hill (77)
MID4: Player - Jack Newnes (60)

RUC1: Player - Robert Warnock (81)

FWD1: Player -  Jeremy Howe (96)
FWD2: Player - Mark Hutchings (OOP) (C) (103)
FWD3: Player - Nick Robertson (OOP) (6)
FWD4: Player - Nick Suban (OOP) (53.5)

UTI1: Player -   Dom Tyson (MID) (VC) (240)
UTI2: Player -   Josh Kelly (MID) (89)


Memphistopheles

#16
For the record I LOVE PLAYING DURING THE BYES.

Gives me a chance to win :D. Though the Lambs have a pretty handy team this week so I may not win.

Team Name: Taiwan Dolphins
Captain: Matt Rosa
Vice Captain: Cyril Rioli
EME C/VC: Stephen Coniglio

DEF1: Player - Dean Terlich (62)
DEF2: Player - Cameron Sutcliffe (105)
DEF3: Player - Will Langford (120)
DEF4: Player - Josh Hunt (83)

MID1: Player - Stephen Coniglio (76)
MID2: Player - Matt Rosa (C) (154)
MID3: Player - Ryan Lester (67)
MID4: Player - Clinton Jones (98)

RUC1: Player - Tom Derickx (81)

FWD1: Player - Cyril Rioli (VC) (85.5)
FWD2: Player - Tory Dickson (10)
FWD3: Player - Joel Patfull (OOP) (46.5)
FWD4: Player - Zac Tuohy (OOP) (36)

UTI1: Player - Tom Cutler (DEF) (81)
UTI2: Player - Jamie Bennell (MID) (84)

EME1: Player - Tom Boyd (FWD)
EME2: Player - Tom Campbell (FWD)
EME3: Player - Patrick McGinnity.

I highly doubt any of the emergencies will play but we at least have 15 guys on the park (pending final teams).

Rusty00

#17
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 09, 2014, 09:48:19 AM
Team Name: PNG Head Hunters
Captain: Dyson Heppell
Vice Captain: Tom Rockliff
EME C/VC: Player: Shaun Burgoyne

DEF1: Player - Shaun Burgoyne (108)
DEF2: Player - Rhys Stanley (24)
DEF3: Player - Lee Spurr (61)
DEF4: Player - Colin Garland (69)

MID1: Player - Tom Rockliff (VC) (291)
MID2: Player - Dyson Heppell (C) (318)
MID3: Player - Danyle Pearce (76)
MID4: Player - Tom Bell (DNP) = Kurt Aylett (OOP) (18)

RUC1: Player - Trent West (90)

FWD1: Player - Jeffy Garlett (31)
FWD2: Player - Jack Billings (108)
FWD3: Player - Luke Delaney (OOP) (10.5)
FWD4: Player - Andrew Phillips (OOP) (24)

UTI1: Player -  Harry Cunningham (MID) (38)
UTI2: Player -  Zac Clarke (RUCK) (95)

EME1: Player -  Kurt Aylett (DEF) (36)
EME2: Player - 
EME3: Player - 
Forgot about the old OOP.

Rusty00

Quote from: Adamant on May 08, 2014, 08:50:13 PM
Three rucks named in the starting 15, is this an XVs first?
We've got 3 in our starting XV as well ;)

Jroo

Quote from: Rusty00 on May 09, 2014, 01:29:08 PM
Quote from: Adamant on May 08, 2014, 08:50:13 PM
Three rucks named in the starting 15, is this an XVs first?
We've got 3 in our starting XV as well ;)
We've got 0  :'(

Rusty00

Quote from: JROO8 on May 09, 2014, 01:35:08 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 09, 2014, 01:29:08 PM
Quote from: Adamant on May 08, 2014, 08:50:13 PM
Three rucks named in the starting 15, is this an XVs first?
We've got 3 in our starting XV as well ;)
We've got 0  :'(
We've only got 2 forwards at the moment - 1 if Jeffy gets the cut from the final Carlton 22 :-\

Nails

Quote from: Rusty00 on May 09, 2014, 01:29:08 PM
Quote from: Adamant on May 08, 2014, 08:50:13 PM
Three rucks named in the starting 15, is this an XVs first?
We've got 3 in our starting XV as well ;)

Pretty sure we played Bailey, Hale and Roughead a couple times last year. Also Hudson, Hale and Roughead.

Justin Bieber

#22
Quote from: Noz on May 08, 2014, 11:42:00 PM
Quote from: BB67th on May 08, 2014, 08:33:20 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 08, 2014, 08:13:01 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on May 08, 2014, 07:46:16 PM
I REALLY HOPE THAT IN FUTURE SEASONS WE DON'T PLAY DURING THE BYE ROUNDS ..........IT'S A RIDICULOUS SITUATION AND IN NO WAY MIRRORS THE AFL ........WE HAVE A GRAND TOTAL OF 13 PLAYERS TO FIELD
Yeah, I agree. Not sure why AXVs can't follow the WXVs and BXVs (teams from this round, plus bye teams from next round) method or even EXVs (division matches).
We voted to keep it how it is for this season with regular matches.

I'm sure that this will be added to the list of rules to vote on at seasons end.

I have a feeling next season every single rule will have been changed.

Do people not actually realise that everyone is at a disadvantage for the next 3 weeks. Oh boo who you can't name your best XV.

I agree with Noz.  Boo flowering who Nost and Ric and others. If you don't have great depth then flowering trade for some. Don't sook about the bye rounds. Give me a break ::)

Edit: Next rule we will change is that we can't have the VC cause some teams don't have a good enough VC in their side and feel that they are disadvantaged. Get over it you big girls.

Ricochet

Quote from: whatlez on May 09, 2014, 06:22:53 PM
Quote from: Noz on May 08, 2014, 11:42:00 PM
Quote from: BB67th on May 08, 2014, 08:33:20 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 08, 2014, 08:13:01 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on May 08, 2014, 07:46:16 PM
I REALLY HOPE THAT IN FUTURE SEASONS WE DON'T PLAY DURING THE BYE ROUNDS ..........IT'S A RIDICULOUS SITUATION AND IN NO WAY MIRRORS THE AFL ........WE HAVE A GRAND TOTAL OF 13 PLAYERS TO FIELD
Yeah, I agree. Not sure why AXVs can't follow the WXVs and BXVs (teams from this round, plus bye teams from next round) method or even EXVs (division matches).
We voted to keep it how it is for this season with regular matches.

I'm sure that this will be added to the list of rules to vote on at seasons end.

I have a feeling next season every single rule will have been changed.

Do people not actually realise that everyone is at a disadvantage for the next 3 weeks. Oh boo who you can't name your best XV.

I agree with Noz.  Boo flowering who Nost and Ric and others. If you don't have great depth then flowering trade for some. Don't sook about the bye rounds. Give me a break ::)

Edit: Next rule we will change is that we can't have the VC cause some teams don't have a good enough VC in their side and feel that they are disadvantaged. Get over it you big girls.
lol Lez.... I agreed with Noz mate

Jroo

Quote from: whatlez on May 09, 2014, 06:22:53 PM
Quote from: Noz on May 08, 2014, 11:42:00 PM
Quote from: BB67th on May 08, 2014, 08:33:20 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 08, 2014, 08:13:01 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on May 08, 2014, 07:46:16 PM
I REALLY HOPE THAT IN FUTURE SEASONS WE DON'T PLAY DURING THE BYE ROUNDS ..........IT'S A RIDICULOUS SITUATION AND IN NO WAY MIRRORS THE AFL ........WE HAVE A GRAND TOTAL OF 13 PLAYERS TO FIELD
Yeah, I agree. Not sure why AXVs can't follow the WXVs and BXVs (teams from this round, plus bye teams from next round) method or even EXVs (division matches).
We voted to keep it how it is for this season with regular matches.

I'm sure that this will be added to the list of rules to vote on at seasons end.

I have a feeling next season every single rule will have been changed.

Do people not actually realise that everyone is at a disadvantage for the next 3 weeks. Oh boo who you can't name your best XV.

I agree with Noz.  Boo flowering who Nost and Ric and others. If you don't have great depth then flowering trade for some. Don't sook about the bye rounds. Give me a break ::)

Edit: Next rule we will change is that we can't have the VC cause some teams don't have a good enough VC in their side and feel that they are disadvantaged. Get over it you big girls.
Hahahah, yeah I'm you with guys. #depth
But yeah, Ric was agreeing with Noz  ???

Justin Bieber

#25
Team Name: Loas Elephants
Captain: Michael Barlow
Vice Captain Oliver Wines
EME C/VC: Jack Redden

DEF1: Player - Maverick Weller (34)
DEF2: Player - Tom McDonald (40)
DEF3: Player - Ben Stratton (35)
DEF4: Player - Rory Thompson (DNP) = Matt White (OOP) (50)

MID1: Player - Jack Redden (113)
MID2: Player - Travis Boak (112)
MID3: Player - Oliver Wines (VC) (213)
MID4: Player - Michael Barlow (C) (222)

RUC1: Player - Billy Longer (108)

FWD1: Player - Jack Watts (87)
FWD2: Player - Johnathon Patton (44)
FWD3: Player - Stewart Crameri (136)
FWD4: Player - Josh Green (106)

UTI1: Player -   Scott Selwood (MID) (177)
UTI2: Player -   Jordan Lewis (MID) (109)

EME1: Player -  Matt White (MID) (100)
EME2: Player -  Sam Frost (FWD) 
EME3: Player -  Dylan Shiel (MID)


We get all these big sooks and that they don't have enough players. Had a total of 21 players named. Dammit nooo why do I have no depth!?!?!

#depthteamproblems

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Ricochet on May 09, 2014, 06:27:41 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 09, 2014, 06:22:53 PM
Quote from: Noz on May 08, 2014, 11:42:00 PM
Quote from: BB67th on May 08, 2014, 08:33:20 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 08, 2014, 08:13:01 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on May 08, 2014, 07:46:16 PM
I REALLY HOPE THAT IN FUTURE SEASONS WE DON'T PLAY DURING THE BYE ROUNDS ..........IT'S A RIDICULOUS SITUATION AND IN NO WAY MIRRORS THE AFL ........WE HAVE A GRAND TOTAL OF 13 PLAYERS TO FIELD
Yeah, I agree. Not sure why AXVs can't follow the WXVs and BXVs (teams from this round, plus bye teams from next round) method or even EXVs (division matches).
We voted to keep it how it is for this season with regular matches.

I'm sure that this will be added to the list of rules to vote on at seasons end.

I have a feeling next season every single rule will have been changed.

Do people not actually realise that everyone is at a disadvantage for the next 3 weeks. Oh boo who you can't name your best XV.

I agree with Noz.  Boo flowering who Nost and Ric and others. If you don't have great depth then flowering trade for some. Don't sook about the bye rounds. Give me a break ::)

Edit: Next rule we will change is that we can't have the VC cause some teams don't have a good enough VC in their side and feel that they are disadvantaged. Get over it you big girls.
lol Lez.... I agreed with Noz mate
Lol my bad. But I have 21 players named?!!?!? Why can't I just have 15?!?! No fair.

Nige

Quote from: whatlez on May 09, 2014, 06:38:22 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 09, 2014, 06:27:41 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 09, 2014, 06:22:53 PM
Quote from: Noz on May 08, 2014, 11:42:00 PM
Quote from: BB67th on May 08, 2014, 08:33:20 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 08, 2014, 08:13:01 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on May 08, 2014, 07:46:16 PM
I REALLY HOPE THAT IN FUTURE SEASONS WE DON'T PLAY DURING THE BYE ROUNDS ..........IT'S A RIDICULOUS SITUATION AND IN NO WAY MIRRORS THE AFL ........WE HAVE A GRAND TOTAL OF 13 PLAYERS TO FIELD
Yeah, I agree. Not sure why AXVs can't follow the WXVs and BXVs (teams from this round, plus bye teams from next round) method or even EXVs (division matches).
We voted to keep it how it is for this season with regular matches.

I'm sure that this will be added to the list of rules to vote on at seasons end.

I have a feeling next season every single rule will have been changed.

Do people not actually realise that everyone is at a disadvantage for the next 3 weeks. Oh boo who you can't name your best XV.

I agree with Noz.  Boo flowering who Nost and Ric and others. If you don't have great depth then flowering trade for some. Don't sook about the bye rounds. Give me a break ::)

Edit: Next rule we will change is that we can't have the VC cause some teams don't have a good enough VC in their side and feel that they are disadvantaged. Get over it you big girls.
lol Lez.... I agreed with Noz mate
Lol my bad. But I have 21 players named?!!?!? Why can't I just have 15?!?! No fair.
Silly lezley, if some teams have great depth, then obviously other teams won't.  :P

TBH, it's all luck. The byes will be completely different again next year, so it could advantage the teams that are having a shower one this year. I know that kind of contradicts what I was saying, but yeah. I still think the rule at present is stupid haha.

Noz


Nige