Round 8 Lodgement Threads

Started by Ringo, May 06, 2014, 10:39:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Vinny

Is A Hall gonna score 71 and be a good player or is he going to score 30 and be an A HOLE?













...I'll walk myself out.

kilbluff1985

Quote from: Vinny on May 18, 2014, 12:30:03 AM
Is A Hall gonna score 71 and be a good player or is he going to score 30 and be an A HOLE?













...I'll walk myself out.

it's 50/50 lol

Ringo

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 18, 2014, 12:24:08 AM
Ringo according to my calculations for Birmingham to win A Hall needs to score over 71 can you confirm please?
That is correct taking into consideration HGA and assuming you both update scores.

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Ringo on May 17, 2014, 10:34:24 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 17, 2014, 10:28:42 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on May 17, 2014, 07:36:06 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 17, 2014, 07:02:24 PM
Feel sorry for who's playing me this week... Cotchin and Nicky Dal still going :o

No games next week it's North v South challenge
What?
If you took the time to read rules and look at discussions you would have seen that Round 10 of the AFL was always to be a North South Challenge. Same happened last year. I write threads for a reason to keep everyone informed but just wondering whether it is worth my time.
I don't get why this is even brought up. I was saying Cotchin got another 120+ and Dal Santo was looking on track for another 150+ but when I said it, the game was still in progress....

Memphistopheles

Well I better update scores then to give us every chance. No Grima is a bit of a bummer which means we don't get our sub score :(


Staines Steins

Def: Dean Terlich (49), Nathan Grima (dnp), Lee Spurr (40), Rhys Stanley (23)
Mid: Kieren Jack (150*2=300), Tendai Mzungu (117), Josh Kelly (81), Ryan Lester (87)
Ruc: Mark Jamar (104)
For: Kurt Tippett (106), Jamie Elliott (64), Lewis Jetta (126), Josh Jenkins (109)
Uti: Harry Cunningham (41), Lachie Hunter (43)
Sub: Elliott Yeo (112)
E: Ryan Crowley (81), Ivan Maric (-), Kristian Jaksch (-)

Find it hard to believe we are still in this actually. Had some woeful scores this round - five players under 50 and a dnp. Thank god Kieren Jack has hit form again.

Total = 1402+23 (HGA)+20 (posting scores on time) = 1445.

Which in my opinion makes it Birmingham need 91 from their remaining player/players???

kilbluff1985

we need over 71 for A Hall since i'll get 20 for posting

if he is the sub i swear to god i'll flip

Memphistopheles

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 18, 2014, 12:18:50 AM
Birmingham

D: Suckling 66, Dempsey 105  Atley 49, J Hamling DNP                           =220
M: Rockliff 320(C), Zaharakis 76, Hartlett 109, Ziebell 113                       =618
R: Clarke 67                                                                                 =67 
F: Schulz 40, Lamb 33, A. Hall, R. Knight DNP                                      =73
I/C: Burgoyne 131(VC), M Jones 98                                                  =295

Emg Sutcliffe 102(Def), Gleeson 32 (Mid)(Sub), Ambrose 39 (Fwd)

1354/14

have to take Ambrose's score and taking Sutcliffe's score have updated progress accordingly

KB if the numbers you have here are correct then your total is slightly wrong.

Def: 66+105+49+102 = 322
Mid: 320+76+109+113 = 618
Ruc: 67 = 67
For: 40+33+?+39 = 112
Uti: 131+98 = 229 (Not 295 as above).

Total = 1348. Your sub score doesn't come in to affect as Gleeson didn't outscore anyone from what I can see.

Which means I make the match scores to be 1445 vs 1348 + Hall.

Which actually means you need Hall to score 97 to win. So 77...

kilbluff1985

whoops yeah your right glad i didn't find out after he scored 72 lol

Vinny

Yeah A Hall is going to be an A Hole.

kilbluff1985

Quote from: Vinny on May 18, 2014, 12:21:14 PM
Yeah A Hall is going to be an A Hole.

you giving him lessons mate? ;D ;) :P

Vinny

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 18, 2014, 12:24:48 PM
Quote from: Vinny on May 18, 2014, 12:21:14 PM
Yeah A Hall is going to be an A Hole.

you giving him lessons mate? ;D ;) :P
Of course, only being taught by the best.  :P

ossie85



Crosby Cruisers

D: C Hooker 96, S White 40, L Delaney 32, K Mitchell 128/2 = 64
M: T Boak 130*2 = 260, N Jones 124, Jack Redden 121, D Jackson 145
R: R Warnock 100
F: M Robinson 90, D Hale 86, D Smith 92, J Murdoch 89
I: D Shiel 88, N Suban 89
S: D Thomas 55
E: J Paine (Fwd) 69, K Mitchell (OOP), J Impey (OOP) 43

So... all done

Score: 1519

Minus Delaney's 32
Plus Thomas's 55
Plus HGA of 32 (I think)
Plus 20

= 1591

Nige

#147
So Crosby are done on 1519.

Looks like the Rams are gonna win another.  8)

Edit: We've already won, the Rams progressive score a few posts above is without Varcoe's score and iirc, he scored like 87 or something. Add that to the 1480 and that takes us past 1519. Still have to add the sub score, 20 bonus points and whatever Bennell scores.

Feels good to get another win. :) Sorry Oss!

ossie85

Quote from: NigeyS on May 18, 2014, 05:01:46 PM
So Crosby are done on 1519.

Looks like the Rams are gonna win another.  8)

1591 :P

Clearly distracted by Cairo's fall from grace :P

Nige

Quote from: ossie85 on May 18, 2014, 05:03:28 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 18, 2014, 05:01:46 PM
So Crosby are done on 1519.

Looks like the Rams are gonna win another.  8)

1591 :P

Clearly distracted by Cairo's fall from grace :P
Oh, my bad...  :-[

Well, if you look at my explanation in the post above, we're still gonna win.  ;)