Round 8 Lodgement Threads

Started by Ringo, May 06, 2014, 10:39:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

kilbluff1985

Birmingham

D: Suckling 66, Dempsey                                                               =66
M: Rockliff (C), Zaharakis, Hartlett
R: Clarke
F: Schulz, Lamb,
I/C: Burgoyne 131(VC), M Jones                                                      =197

Emg Sutcliffe (Def), Gleeson (Mid)(Sub), Ambrose(Fwd)

197/2

Spite

Quote from: Spite on May 09, 2014, 06:44:20 PM
Hebdenbridge Hedgehogs

DEF Jarrad McVeigh (VC) 150 , Aaron Mullett, Paul Duffield, Jack Watts

MID Scott Selwood(EVC), Brent Stanton (C), Toby Greene, Danyle Pearce

UTIL Lachie Neale, Josh Thomas

RUCK Nic Naitanui

FWD Dustin Martin, Luke Parker 140, Matthew DeBoer, Craig Bird 114

EMG: Jarred Rivers (B), Mark Hutchings, (M - sub), Michael Rischitelli (OOP RUCK), Jack Riewoldt (F)

Great start by the hedgies, 404/3 :)

Nige

Liverpool Rams - 198/2

B: J.Gibson 75, B.Houli, S.Thompson, M.Firrito
M: D.Heppell (c), L.Dunstan, H.Bennell, M.Hallahan 123
R: T.Goldstein
F: J.Billings, T.Cloke, B.Harvey, H.Crozier
I: T.Varcoe, L.Taylor

E: T.Curren (M - sub), L.Thomas (F), L.Casboult (R - OOP), J.Saunders (D - OOP)

Players in italics to be confirmed next week (AFL Round 9)




Hallahan pulls out a 123.  :o Gibbo with a decent 75.

Justin Bieber

So I dont get it. If one of my players who don't have the bye this round or next and I named them for this week but I want them next week instead, I don't get it? Lets say one of my players is playing Geelong this week then next week they are playing Melbourne. Icant choose the game I want them to play in?

Justin Bieber

I know the answer, but I see it silly.

Nige

Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 11:07:02 AM
So I dont get it. If one of my players who don't have the bye this round or next and I named them for this week but I want them next week instead, I don't get it? Lets say one of my players is playing Geelong this week then next week they are playing Melbourne. Icant choose the game I want them to play in?

Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 11:07:55 AM
I know the answer, but I see it silly.

wat.

Justin Bieber

I don't get the logic of having it over 2 weeks if some of your players can only count for week 1 even though they play both rounds...

Torpedo10

Quote from: NigeyS on May 09, 2014, 08:35:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on May 09, 2014, 08:20:26 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on May 09, 2014, 08:03:01 PM
DEF: Brodie Smith, Mark Baguley
MID: Callan Ward (VC), Tom Liberatore (C), Jared Polec
RUCK: Trent West
FWD: Marco paparone, Joe Daniher


MANCHESTER MAGIC
Daniher was locked at the bounce Torp. You can't name him.
dammit. Really hate bye rounds.

kilbluff1985

so you would rather try and field a team somehow with just this rounds players?

Justin Bieber

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 10, 2014, 02:35:41 PM
so you would rather try and field a team somehow with just this rounds players?
Yes.

ossie85

Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 10, 2014, 02:35:41 PM
so you would rather try and field a team somehow with just this rounds players?
Yes.

That option would basically mean teams would win on luck

Nige

Quote from: ossie85 on May 10, 2014, 03:26:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 10, 2014, 02:35:41 PM
so you would rather try and field a team somehow with just this rounds players?
Yes.

That option would basically mean teams would win on luck
Exactly, and I don't like that. AXVs are doing in this way and a number of teams have incomplete XVs.

Justin Bieber

Quote from: NigeyS on May 10, 2014, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on May 10, 2014, 03:26:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 10, 2014, 02:35:41 PM
so you would rather try and field a team somehow with just this rounds players?
Yes.

That option would basically mean teams would win on luck
Exactly, and I don't like that. AXVs are doing in this way and a number of teams have incomplete XVs.

Bad luck. Depth teams to get rewarded.

ossie85

Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 03:41:24 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 10, 2014, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on May 10, 2014, 03:26:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 10, 2014, 02:35:41 PM
so you would rather try and field a team somehow with just this rounds players?
Yes.

That option would basically mean teams would win on luck
Exactly, and I don't like that. AXVs are doing in this way and a number of teams have incomplete XVs.

Bad luck. Depth teams to get rewarded.

not about depth. You could have 30 players play every week and 25 of them have the bye one week, compared to a side who have 10 players play every week and all of them play.  How is that rewarding depth?

Justin Bieber

Quote from: ossie85 on May 10, 2014, 03:45:51 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 03:41:24 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on May 10, 2014, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on May 10, 2014, 03:26:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on May 10, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 10, 2014, 02:35:41 PM
so you would rather try and field a team somehow with just this rounds players?
Yes.

That option would basically mean teams would win on luck
Exactly, and I don't like that. AXVs are doing in this way and a number of teams have incomplete XVs.

Bad luck. Depth teams to get rewarded.

not about depth. You could have 30 players play every week and 25 of them have the bye one week, compared to a side who have 10 players play every week and all of them play.  How is that rewarding depth?
The chances of that is unlikely.