Sam Lloyd's bye turning anyone off??

[Keeper27]

Only have Danger, Fasolo and Lloyd down there so not too much concern there for me

same. Lloyd is actually on me bench so i dont really care.

[ClarksonsArmy]

As long as you have 18 fielded players...

[frenzy]

Nup, cos I don't care about this flowering Rnd8 bye anymore, it's too hard to balance the team. Having a holiday Rnd 8.

[Ringo]

You only need to field 18 players on the field in Round 8 but injury will probably play a role as well.

As RD says hard to ignore a cash cow who will rise 100/150k before the byes.  Worst case scenariou you can downgrade him in Round 8 if another forward on the bubble and pocket the cash.

[H1bb3i2d]

I figure I'd rather cop a donut from Lloyd and then a couple of handy 60s rather than a 20, 20, 0 from Rohan IF he even plays over the byes.

Oh, and the cash is handy, too ;)

If you already have a forward bench that is generating cash and will score alright over the byes then by all means let Lloyd through to the keeper - but not many people do.

[Blues Blues Blues]

I figure I'd rather cop a donut from Lloyd and then a couple of handy 60s rather than a 20, 20, 0 from Rohan IF he even plays over the byes.

Oh, and the cash is handy, too ;)

If you already have a forward bench that is generating cash and will score alright over the byes then by all means let Lloyd through to the keeper - but not many people do.

My thinking also

[tor01doc]

My best guess is a combination of the following on forward benches

JKH
Rohan
Impey
Taylor

All to make money except Rohan.

If you have Rohan then Lloyd seems a no brainer.

Another popular option is Ellis out, Taylor to mids and Lloyd (or Fasolo) in.