Swans NEAFL

[Capper]

R14

Sydney Swans 10.10-70
Ainslie 9.10-64

Sydney Swans
Goal Kickers: D. Towers 3, T. Nankervis 3, T. Membrey , S. Biggs , S. Naismith , R. O''Keefe
Best Players: S. Biggs, T. Mitchell, D. Towers, R. O''Keefe, D. Hadden, T. Walsh

[Mailman the 2nd]

I agree tabs I think Walsh will go back to Ireland

[kilbluff1985]

just watched last nights "On The Couch" they were linking Tom Mitchell with Paul Roos because Mitchell lived with him or something lol

[Capper]

just watched last nights "On The Couch" they were linking Tom Mitchell with Paul Roos because Mitchell lived with him or something lol

Roos wont be at the Dees when his contract is up though

[SydneyRox]

just watched last nights "On The Couch" they were linking Tom Mitchell with Paul Roos because Mitchell lived with him or something lol

Yeah - and in what world would a swap Mitchell for Frawley be fair and even?? LMFAO

[Mailman the 2nd]

Melbourne doesn't need Mitchell and Sydney don't need Frawley.

Pretty big monetary difference between the two at the moment anyway we couldn't afford

[Big Mac]

Melbourne doesn't need Mitchell and Sydney don't need Frawley.

Pretty big monetary difference between the two at the moment anyway we couldn't afford

Melbourne don't need Mitchell?  ???

[Capper]

Sydney dont need Frwley as we have Laidler.

Mitchell dont need Mitchell as there are other areas where they need players before mids

[Big Mac]

Sydney dont need Frwley as we have Laidler.

Mitchell dont need Mitchell as there are other areas where they need players before mids

Not saying it's a good swap by any means but Melbourne's number one priority is the midfield, and if there was any chance of us landing Mitchell i'm sure we'd be after him.

[Capper]

Sydney dont need Frwley as we have Laidler.

Mitchell dont need Mitchell as there are other areas where they need players before mids

Not saying it's a good swap by any means but Melbourne's number one priority is the midfield, and if there was any chance of us landing Mitchell i'm sure we'd be after him.

more likely to go home than to Victoria

[Mailman the 2nd]

Melbourne doesn't need Mitchell and Sydney don't need Frawley.

Pretty big monetary difference between the two at the moment anyway we couldn't afford

Melbourne don't need Mitchell?  ???

I'm sure Melbourne could use Mitchell sure, but Frawley would be more important. Media reports keep saying he's wanting 600k+ a year and if that's true, then Swans definitely couldn't facilitate him.

[SydneyRox]

Melbourne doesn't need Mitchell and Sydney don't need Frawley.

Pretty big monetary difference between the two at the moment anyway we couldn't afford

Melbourne don't need Mitchell?  ???

I'm sure Melbourne could use Mitchell sure, but Frawley would be more important. Media reports keep saying he's wanting 600k+ a year and if that's true, then Swans definitely couldn't facilitate him.

We will give him $200k, a premiership and a carton of corona's

Take it or leave it.  8)

[Capper]

Melbourne doesn't need Mitchell and Sydney don't need Frawley.

Pretty big monetary difference between the two at the moment anyway we couldn't afford

Melbourne don't need Mitchell?  ???

I'm sure Melbourne could use Mitchell sure, but Frawley would be more important. Media reports keep saying he's wanting 600k+ a year and if that's true, then Swans definitely couldn't facilitate him.

how is he worth that much?? Surely the Dees can afford that but depends if he wants a Premiership or not though

[Mailman the 2nd]

Towers in for debut for Jones with Tippett still having knee problems

[SydneyRox]

great for towers, as a bigger guy reckon he should avoid the green vest.

been waiting to see him for a while would like to see him play a full game at least