Mummy to who???

[MC]

Handy cover for Mumford for a week hopefully :)

[Bully]

Handy cover for Mumford for a week hopefully :)

Mumford will be out for 3-4 weeks, think you need a Plan B.

[enzedder]

Really hard decision.
Was hoping to hang on to Mummy. Could still be back after missing this week...Cameron said it was minor...1-2 weeks...didn't want to get it infected and flushed it out...3-4 weeks according to Doc Larkins on afl website.
I'm not doing anything until before Kangas game. Will see if Currie plays/sub etc...might run with him as cover.
I've done a few trades already and burning one on Mummy for no games will be bitter.

Initially I was thinking Goldy. Great option. Lost some value and cover in Currie if he goes down for a week or two.
However his bye sucks...Mummy is R9, Goldy R8 and having a look at my team if I'm not careful I'll eat an unnecessary doughnut there which might mean Minson or Cox (with R9byes) would be  better picks.
Minson has been okay. Poor first week against WCE (62) but last 3...120,103,87. He's ranked 5th atm behind Sandi, Mummy, Jacobs and Cox. I've got Sandi, Mummy is the problem, Jacobs has the problematic R8 bye too which leaves Cox as the other real possibility.
I'm leaning towards Minson if I do trade.
I'm hoping like hell that Currie can cover and maybe Mumford can recover quickly. Worth noting Minson has lost 53k already and has a BE of 147 this week.
I can see myself trading Minson in this week to keep things ticking...
Massive decision for us Mummy owners to make.

[T Dog]

Check out Hampson....$cash benefit... :)

[Judd Magic]

Really hard decision.
Was hoping to hang on to Mummy. Could still be back after missing this week...Cameron said it was minor...1-2 weeks...didn't want to get it infected and flushed it out...3-4 weeks according to Doc Larkins on afl website.
I'm not doing anything until before Kangas game. Will see if Currie plays/sub etc...might run with him as cover.
I've done a few trades already and burning one on Mummy for no games will be bitter.

Initially I was thinking Goldy. Great option. Lost some value and cover in Currie if he goes down for a week or two.
However his bye sucks...Mummy is R9, Goldy R8 and having a look at my team if I'm not careful I'll eat an unnecessary doughnut there which might mean Minson or Cox (with R9byes) would be  better picks.
Minson has been okay. Poor first week against WCE (62) but last 3...120,103,87. He's ranked 5th atm behind Sandi, Mummy, Jacobs and Cox. I've got Sandi, Mummy is the problem, Jacobs has the problematic R8 bye too which leaves Cox as the other real possibility.
I'm leaning towards Minson if I do trade.
I'm hoping like hell that Currie can cover and maybe Mumford can recover quickly. Worth noting Minson has lost 53k already and has a BE of 147 this week.
I can see myself trading Minson in this week to keep things ticking...
Massive decision for us Mummy owners to make.

Only has a breakeven of 123 according to SC Gold.

Don't know where you got 147 from.  ::)

[enzedder]

Check out Hampson....$cash benefit... :)

107,107,69...alright...69 bit of a worry...but off balanced by price 370k...BE 46 so cash to be made.
Problem is he isn't a keeper...another trade will be used up to upgrade.
Also has a R8 bye which if he stays in my team for would cause problems...might work for others but he's not for me.

[enzedder]

Really hard decision.
Was hoping to hang on to Mummy. Could still be back after missing this week...Cameron said it was minor...1-2 weeks...didn't want to get it infected and flushed it out...3-4 weeks according to Doc Larkins on afl website.
I'm not doing anything until before Kangas game. Will see if Currie plays/sub etc...might run with him as cover.
I've done a few trades already and burning one on Mummy for no games will be bitter.

Initially I was thinking Goldy. Great option. Lost some value and cover in Currie if he goes down for a week or two.
However his bye sucks...Mummy is R9, Goldy R8 and having a look at my team if I'm not careful I'll eat an unnecessary doughnut there which might mean Minson or Cox (with R9byes) would be  better picks.
Minson has been okay. Poor first week against WCE (62) but last 3...120,103,87. He's ranked 5th atm behind Sandi, Mummy, Jacobs and Cox. I've got Sandi, Mummy is the problem, Jacobs has the problematic R8 bye too which leaves Cox as the other real possibility.
I'm leaning towards Minson if I do trade.
I'm hoping like hell that Currie can cover and maybe Mumford can recover quickly. Worth noting Minson has lost 53k already and has a BE of 147 this week.
I can see myself trading Minson in this week to keep things ticking...
Massive decision for us Mummy owners to make.

Only has a breakeven of 123 according to SC Gold.

Don't know where you got 147 from.  ::)

too serious

[Judd Magic]

Really hard decision.
Was hoping to hang on to Mummy. Could still be back after missing this week...Cameron said it was minor...1-2 weeks...didn't want to get it infected and flushed it out...3-4 weeks according to Doc Larkins on afl website.
I'm not doing anything until before Kangas game. Will see if Currie plays/sub etc...might run with him as cover.
I've done a few trades already and burning one on Mummy for no games will be bitter.

Initially I was thinking Goldy. Great option. Lost some value and cover in Currie if he goes down for a week or two.
However his bye sucks...Mummy is R9, Goldy R8 and having a look at my team if I'm not careful I'll eat an unnecessary doughnut there which might mean Minson or Cox (with R9byes) would be  better picks.
Minson has been okay. Poor first week against WCE (62) but last 3...120,103,87. He's ranked 5th atm behind Sandi, Mummy, Jacobs and Cox. I've got Sandi, Mummy is the problem, Jacobs has the problematic R8 bye too which leaves Cox as the other real possibility.
I'm leaning towards Minson if I do trade.
I'm hoping like hell that Currie can cover and maybe Mumford can recover quickly. Worth noting Minson has lost 53k already and has a BE of 147 this week.
I can see myself trading Minson in this week to keep things ticking...
Massive decision for us Mummy owners to make.

Only has a breakeven of 123 according to SC Gold.

Don't know where you got 147 from.  ::)

too serious

Well they are obviously wrong.  8)

[enzedder]

http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/news/2014-04-16/shaw-to-miss-crows
mummy 1-2 weeks ... not 3-4

[Vinny]

For those considering Goldy, this from the AFL website -

"Daniel Currie is also a good chance to renew his ruck partnership with Todd Goldstein against the Pies"

flower off Currie. :P

[Bully]

http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/news/2014-04-16/shaw-to-miss-crows
mummy 1-2 weeks ... not 3-4

Hmmm, maybe I'll hold after all, will wait and see if Currie is named.

[enzedder]

http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/news/2014-04-16/shaw-to-miss-crows
mummy 1-2 weeks ... not 3-4

Hmmm, maybe I'll hold after all, will wait and see if Currie is named.

Same boat...will be sitting by my laptop before the Kangas game this week. 8)

[Judd Magic]

http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/news/2014-04-16/shaw-to-miss-crows
mummy 1-2 weeks ... not 3-4

Saw a GWS statement today saying Mumford would miss 3-4 weeks.

Someone is telling porky pies.

[Bully]

If it was 1-2 weeks one could always put put the E on Currie and if he delivers, keep Mummy on the field, however 3-4 is too long.

[MC]

The worst part is not knowing. For all we know he could be back next week, or he could be rested/out until after their bye...