Mummy to who???

Started by Bully, April 13, 2014, 09:48:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

enzedder

Quote from: Bully on April 16, 2014, 08:35:43 PM
If it was 1-2 weeks one could always put put the E on Currie and if he delivers, keep Mummy on the field, however 3-4 is too long.
That's certainly the case for the next 2 weeks...we will get a look at Currie's score if he plays to loophole him with Mumford.
Minson, Jacobs and Cox will all be available to trade to after NM's games too.

js19

Step up Currie! I'll take a couple of sneaky 60s from you!

Noticed SC gold has Mummy as a rd 8-9 return though...

ClarksonsArmy

Imagine if people traded mummy out this week for their new ruckman to be a late withdrawal...


This brings up a bigger point now on how players that are now only 90%. Fit will miss....

This will be a massive watch this space in 2014, especially in rucks and fwds as depth and cover is minimal

elite

Not knowing if it's 1-2 weeks or 3-4 is not making this decision easy. Which source to trust....

Ricochet

SuperCoach Paige ‏@SuperCoachPaige  7m
Despite the AFL website listing Mumford yesterday as a 3-4 week return on their injury list, the Giants have announced he will miss a maximum of only two games.