Fasolo is looking delicious

[desired77]

trade him in straight away next week. bang

[Vinny]

Nathan Gordon looks solid as too.

[Blues Blues Blues]

Rohan to fasolo, looks delicious

[crowls]

like idea of caddy to lloyd as well.    cash cow and bank.   
caddy probably go and ton up now

[spudaroos]

Went Rohan to Fasolo this week, feeling happy. Granted he wont score tons too often but scores in the 70 region would be handy with so many low scoring fwd rooks out there.

[tor01doc]

Lloyd!

Too good to be true?

[djbics]

Lloyd!

Too good to be true?

Can't take my eyes offa you....

Da da, da da, da DA da da, dada da da, da da DAAAAAAAA...... Oh pretty baby.... 

[FonFatty]

I have a feeling all the fwd rooks will perform this week to really give us a headache.

[Danzac]

Lloyd!

Too good to be true?

James Magner?

[HotTiges]

Fasolo hmm.caddy f5 and higgo f6.see bow caddy goes vs wc

[theta]

Can somone explain the fasolo score? 

71 DT, 106 SC

20 disp (11 kicks 9 hbs), 4 marks, 3 tackles, frees 1/2, kicked 0.1.

Why the 106 sc? 

[poolboybob]

10 contested possessions and 80% efficiency in wet conditions - highest efficiency for any player on the Pies.

[Vinny]

Can somone explain the fasolo score? 

71 DT, 106 SC

20 disp (11 kicks 9 hbs), 4 marks, 3 tackles, frees 1/2, kicked 0.1.

Why the 106 sc?

He was extremely efficient at least in comparison to other players. He was going at 80% effeciency.

As opposed to Beams (63) Pendles (66) Swan (66) Dusty (48) Cotchin (46) just to name a few of the popular picks.

DT is about racking it up, SC is about effeciency.

Which is why Dusty even though he had 48% effeciency. He got 107 DT for his 29 disposals but only 94 SC.

[HotTiges]

Looks like an elite user in the backline.pies must love him with the ball in his hands

[theta]

I understand the efficiency element of sc, but kinda expected a 90-95 tops, not a 106.