Round 4 progressive totals

[LaHug]

raise you Huggy

766/10
only 4 scores over 70 (but 3 of them have been tons, or a mega-ton in Beamers case)

Are you sure you didn't miscount?! That's impressively bad.

[essendon2]

757/8 8)

Gunston, Suckling, Mitchell, Ablett (C) and Stevie J tonight ;)

[ADEZ]

711 from 8
Cop a 0 from Mumford and Ward was underwhelming with 59

But honestly don't mind! Port were amazing and Melbourne bet Carlton! Surely Carlton won't continue with the flag in the next 2 years, top 4 etc. talk

[pommyadam]

raise you Huggy

766/10
only 4 scores over 70 (but 3 of them have been tons, or a mega-ton in Beamers case)

Are you sure you didn't miscount?! That's impressively bad.

as of then:
Griffiths, Cotchin, Ellard, Daisy, Watts, Hanley, Lobbe
shining lights being Beams, Dusty, Simpson

and then throw in Caddy, Scooter C
but Higgins, Gunston, Smitchell and DSwallow, Suckling :D

it's either BAD, or tons
9 scores over 70, and 8 over 100, and 4 over 120
I can't make this stuff up

1537 with 5 left (McDonald, Watson, Parker, Dunstan, Sandi)

[ADEZ]

1420 with 8 to come
Not terrible considering I copped a 0 for Mumford and then throw in ward and caddy

[rider]

1471 9 to come

[GoLions]

1789/17, Ablett C

Would've been nice if Caddy wasn't the sub. Cox could've scored a bit more. Forgot to bench Ellis for Aish.
Parker, McVeigh, Dunstan, Sandi, Danger to play.

[nrich102]

1502/16

Not bad with Lueys 10 I guess  :-\

[essendon2]

1558/13 8)

~ 6 Premo's + 1 MP + 2 Rooks to come

[Spite]

1526 with 8 to play, have a mummy 0 and caddy 38 in there too so pretty happy so far :)

[LaHug]

1502/15 and C... not the worst but very, very far from the best. Still have Currie to come (thanks McEvoy) so will probably get worse.

[nas]

1735/17
Watson,McVeigh Dangerfield,Dunstan.Sandilands to play

[henry]

1181/11 going better this week in rdt than AF lol.

[Ringo]

1751/15 not bad this week after last weeks disaster

[Mr.Craig]

2067.

Seeing plenty of worse scores...and plenty of better ones.