PENDLES AND BEAMS IN DOUBT

[kilbluff1985]

Take the VC off pendles n Beams. On to Cotchin

will get tagged with no Deledio

[sniper]

In DT I've moved the VC to Priddis. Just hope this week isn't his annual concussion...

[Blues Blues Blues]

Just thrown the V on Rocky

[sniper]

My V is SC is on Libba.

[Ramus]

Pendlebury V for me but I don't think I have ever managed to make use of the loophole, just leave the C on GAJ.

[H1bb3i2d]

My V is SC is on Libba.

Would love to. But with King my only non-player, Beams it is

[shorty3264]

Well the final teams are out and they have both been named. So it just remains how they perform given they won't be 100%

[Big Mac]

Pendlebury V for me but I don't think I have ever managed to make use of the loophole, just leave the C on GAJ.

Same here. Used it to take JPK's 140 round 1 last year. Then GAJ scores 170 odd

[kilbluff1985]

if Pendles gets lower then 120 giving Libba the C

[Marcos83]

They both killed it. Top scorers for Pies

[tor01doc]

So keep Beams but if VC on Pendles back Gaz as C?

[RaisyDaisy]

So keep Beams but if VC on Pendles back Gaz as C?

Wait on final scaling

I have Pendles VC, and I think I will take anything 130+ as I feel like Langford should get the job on Ablett and keep him sub 130

[tor01doc]

Ablett loves Hawthorn.

[RaisyDaisy]

Ablett loves Hawthorn.

True, but Langford has never played him. I'm probably giving Langford way too much credit, but anything 130+ needs to be considered to lock in. Ablett would have to go 150+ for it to backfire

[Bully]

So keep Beams but if VC on Pendles back Gaz as C?

128 is right on the cusp, in fact I hate these scores, no-mans land. I think I'll back Gaz.