Friday Night VC Loophole

[Luigi197]

I don't have Pendlebury. (don't shoot me; he'll come eventually  :-X ;D )

So with GAZ Captain, a smart VC could separate me from some tough H2H matches this week.

What are the chances of Cotchin getting his efficiency up to really have his SC score finally reflect his impact?
Will Martin tear up a Collingwood defence with some game-changing stuff?
Is Beams likely to somehow to rise above Pendlebury?
Will the outcome largely affect any of these? A Collingwood win most a forecasting, but Richmond have the ability for some high-impact stuff.
Should i be happy with a 130+ score, considering GAZ v Hawks and his form and opposition?

Cheers guys  :)

[RaisyDaisy]

I'd go with Cotchin

[Ricochet]

Be careful with Cotchin. Macaffer is a very very good tagger.
I'm going with Beams

[redfield]

I'd go with Beams and look for 140 given Ablett's average against Hawthorn and current form.

[GoLions]

Wouldn't take anything under 140

Pendles or Beams should both be good options, not sure on Cotchin because if the Pies win his score may be affected, whereas someone like Pendles will likely score reasonably well even in a loss, and massive in a win

[RaisyDaisy]

Yeah good point lads, The Caff might do a job on him

The Pies need this, and Pendles showed he can step up when in need vs Syd, so perhaps Pendles

Agree, anything below 140 isn't enough, but with that being said, I might lock in a 130odd score because Langford might get the job on Ablett, which hasn't happened before

[timtim]

Libba (vs GWS) > GAZ if you have him

[RaisyDaisy]

Libba (vs GWS) > GAZ if you have him

That's what I really want to do - but King is my only non playing player which means I cant, and have to go with Pendles/Beams

[E-Lemon_ator]

I have all of Pendles, Beams & Martin but am going Rockliff VC (vs Pt Adel) into Gazza
Will take rocky to score 145 to put the C on a non scorer.  Not out of the question!

[GoLions]

Rockliff VC (vs Pt Adel) into Gazza
Will take rocky to score 145 to put the C on a non scorer.  Not out of the question!

I really wanted to do this, but don't have a non-scoring player to loophole Rocky as the Dees play Saturday arvo as well  :-\

[Luigi197]

hmm thanks guys. so it is looking like Beams is the safer option by quite a bit for me tonight :)

[LF]

Rockliff VC (vs Pt Adel) into Gazza
Will take rocky to score 145 to put the C on a non scorer.  Not out of the question!

I really wanted to do this, but don't have a non-scoring player to loophole Rocky as the Dees play Saturday arvo as well  :-\

I will be doing this Rocky into Gazza will be using McCarthy if I take Rocky`s score should be enough time between games to make the switch.

[E-Lemon_ator]

Brisbane play at 210pm (vic time) and Gazza plays at 740 (vic time) Leabes you 2 1/2 hours or so to make the trade.

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 :)
Going to be a wet and slippery night at the MCG, which to my mind is not conducive to high SC scores. So with that in mind, and having both Thurlow and Sandi will go Gazza as VC and Sandi as Captain at Pattersons Stadium.
But to return to your thread, if I had to pick one I'd go with Dusty.    ;)

[GoLions]

:)
Going to be a wet and slippery night at the MCG, which to my mind is not conducive to high SC scores. So with that in mind, and having both Thurlow and Sandi will go Gazza as VC and Sandi as Captain at Pattersons Stadium.
But to return to your thread, if I had to pick one I'd go with Dusty.    ;)

How does this effect SC scores? This would advantage Pendles greatly, as the guys who use the ball the best will get massive points. Remember, every game awards 3300 points in SC no matter what.
Also, Sandi doesn't have many good mids to tap hitouts to advantage, which will impact his score a bit.