To have Swan or Ablett

[chatters24]

Come on guys, your not serious about not having Ablett are you. Just have a look at Ablett's start to 2009 and the answer is clear.

You can't justify getting Ablett on how he started last year can you? That's 12 months ago and we're just about to start the 2010 season. What he did and did not do 12 months ago is totally irrelevant right now. Is he really the best value for money? No I don't believe so because I don't think that he will better or match his very lofty average of last year. Each to their own though.

[BGK]

I cant understand why everyone needs to have Ablett or Swan. They are expensive and the only average between 10 to 20 points more than the other premium mids. IMO Its not going to be decided by that sort of scoreline. The money you can save on not getting either and upgrading other players will balance out the fact you dont have them. I say leave them both out and get Bartel.

[Prospector_1]

I cant understand why everyone needs to have Ablett or Swan. They are expensive and the only average between 10 to 20 points more than the other premium mids. IMO Its not going to be decided by that sort of scoreline. The money you can save on not getting either and upgrading other players will balance out the fact you dont have them. I say leave them both out and get Bartel.

10 - 20 points each week - maybe 300 points across the year.

How many games did you lose last year by 10 - 20 points?

How much difference would 300 points have made to your overall result last year?

Does it matter? Not necessarily, because it's up to you what you do with your DreamTeam!