Grundy Problem

[Marcos83]

Have Sandi + Hmac as rucks and so far very happy. However I have a 360k grundy on the bench doing nothing for me. His price has not moved.

I had him for cover for Sandi just in case but his looking fitter than ever.

Should I downgrade and then upgrade caddy?

[lukebomber]

Grundy > Currie and upgrade Caddy

[Capper]

Wow thats alot of money on the bench. Too much in fact

[Marcos83]

Yeah tell me about it.

[H1bb3i2d]

There's always Hampson if he's back this week? Would provide ruck cover if you find you're alright cash-wise until the byes, will make a pretty quickfire $100oddk and then bam, unload. That's more of a corrective-you-took- the-wrong-option-trade. But if you dont think you need the cover anymore, then yeah probably just take the cash and use it, but dont expect Currie to play too many games or score too well as cover... if youre not going to use the cash in the next fortnight its almost worth investing it in Hampson imo, but upgrading Caddy will do you better points-wise

[GoLions]

Grundy-->Currie
HMac-->Mummy

[js19]

Wow thats alot of money on the bench. Too much in fact

Haha, not that much...

I've got a guy in my league with the following rucks:
Mummy
Sandi
Maric
McIntosh
::)

[Marcos83]

Ok I like the hmac > mummy by going grundy > currie.

What about Grundy > currie. Swap caddy with GWS kelly.

Kelly is excellent bench cover for the whole season and can see him making at least 200k. Thoughts?

[js19]

Ok I like the hmac > mummy by going grundy > currie.

What about Grundy > currie. Swap caddy with GWS kelly.

Kelly is excellent bench cover for the whole season and can see him making at least 200k. Thoughts?

The above is an oxymoron. If he's all season bench cover, then value is irrelevant.

Depends what your worst problems are though. If there's nothing to desperately fix, downgrade Grundy and hold the cash for your first major upgrade somewhere

[Marcos83]

Nothing deperately needs fixing. Pocket grundys 220k when going to currie and then another 100k by going caddy(not performing and a waste really)to kelly. 320k + 20k reserve gives me enough money in a few weeks to bring in JELWOOD.

MIDFIELD WILL BE AS SUCH:

GAJ, Pendles, Watson, Rockcliffe, Selwood, Beams, Ellis.

Nothing oxymoron about that I say. Im going for league and should win next 3 fixtures so why not get kelly and at the same time bring in Jelwood and see kelly rise to 350-400k for future downgrade?

[js19]

If you're looking to make cash and downgrade Kelly down the track, that makes sense. My point was that if you're thinking of keeping him all season as cover, then it doesn't matter what he ends up being worth

[Ricochet]

Keep mate. Loophole your ruck scores up through the byes and then look to downgrade/upgrade. Those 3 ruckmen will become very important through the byes. Also Grundy faces an inexperienced ruck division from Richmond this week, then an injured Goldstein, then a ruckless Essendon

[spudaroos]

Downgrade him ASAP, pretty foolish to have 3 300k rucks in your team when you could have fielded Sandi and a 500K+ ruck from the start.

[Bones Bombers]

Nothing deperately needs fixing. Pocket grundys 220k when going to currie and then another 100k by going caddy(not performing and a waste really)to kelly. 320k + 20k reserve gives me enough money in a few weeks to bring in JELWOOD.

MIDFIELD WILL BE AS SUCH:

GAJ, Pendles, Watson, Rockcliffe, Selwood, Beams, Ellis.

Nothing oxymoron about that I say. Im going for league and should win next 3 fixtures so why not get kelly and at the same time bring in Jelwood and see kelly rise to 350-400k for future downgrade?

Aah the old 7 mid strategy!

[Marcos83]

LOL

Sorry forgot to add 1 of Ellis\Polec\Dunstan\Tyson\and Kelly in there if I go with the above.