Melbourne Discussion

[Big Mac]

Happy with Garlett - Kent can't play the small forward role consistently and JKH needs much more development. Also creates competition for spots

[Vinny]

What do you guys think you would give up for Garlett?

[Big Mac]

What do you guys think you would give up for Garlett?

Would have to be a fourth-rounder wouldn't it? Our 3rd rounder is dedicated to Stretch and our second rounder would be too high. Unless you have your eye on a player?

[Purple 77]

I was thinking Pick 61, but it does seem a touch low...

Will happily give you Sam Blease or James Strauss as well?

[nrich102]

You'd have to give them a first round pick for them to take Blease (with no Carlton players involved) :P

[Purple 77]

You'd have to give them a first round pick for them to take Blease (with no Carlton players involved) :P

And people thought me stupid mid-season when I said Blease would get delisted   :P in fact they questioned whether I supported the dees  ::)

[Vinny]

61 is way too low for a player that kicked 40 goals just a year ago. He had a tough season but can still play and is young plus has runs on the board guys.

[nrich102]

You'd have to give them a first round pick for them to take Blease (with no Carlton players involved) :P

And people thought me stupid mid-season when I said Blease would get delisted   :P in fact they questioned whether I supported the dees  ::)

Haha. Spuds!

61 is too low, but a second rounder is too high, I think that Blease/Strauss should be part of the deal.

[Big Mac]

You'd have to give them a first round pick for them to take Blease (with no Carlton players involved) :P

And people thought me stupid mid-season when I said Blease would get delisted   :P in fact they questioned whether I supported the dees  ::)

You sure that wasn't just PB having a laugh?  :P

61 is way too low for a player that kicked 40 goals just a year ago. He had a tough season but can still play and is young plus has runs on the board guys.

How about Pick 21 for Garlett + 45? Might work if we can land Sam Frost with that pick
Ideal situation for you guys would be upgrading from 7 to 3 but you would need to offer more than Garlett for that

[Purple 77]

61 is way too low for a player that kicked 40 goals just a year ago. He had a tough season but can still play and is young plus has runs on the board guys.

I definitely agree. It's just Carlton did the brave move of saying we'll trade Garlett/Robinson or delist them, big market value killer  :-\

[Grazz]

61 is way too low for a player that kicked 40 goals just a year ago. He had a tough season but can still play and is young plus has runs on the board guys.

I definitely agree. It's just Carlton did the brave move of saying we'll trade Garlett/Robinson or delist them, big market value killer  :-\

Yeh was thinking the same thing.

[Toga]

61 is way too low for a player that kicked 40 goals just a year ago. He had a tough season but can still play and is young plus has runs on the board guys.

I definitely agree. It's just Carlton did the brave move of saying we'll trade Garlett/Robinson or delist them, big market value killer  :-\

Agree with this ^

61 is too low but Carlton didn't do their value any good by saying that

[kilbluff1985]

Pick 7 + Garlett + Robinson

For pick 3

Would be a good trade for Melbourne might need to give Carlton a 3rd rounder to even it out slightly

A win win for both clubs gives Carlton a better choice of a tall they might want

[valkorum]

Demons give up 61 and 79 to get Garlett and pick 83

Nicely done Melbourne. 

[WCarey18]

Fresh of the Twittersphere.