I got rid of Suckling this week rant!

Started by chaosAD, April 04, 2014, 09:17:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

chaosAD


Nails


tbagrocks

Not that Suckers at that price was good in AF after injury but, poor call based on one game ::)

Yeah just wait, he'll spud it soon enough

me

can see why, just unlucky the hawks are absolutely smashing it out of the park tonight, auto fill hawk team ftw

BratPack


SydneyRox


chaosAD

Not really worried, i got the great KK in for him, will prob score 138

SydneyRox

Quote from: chaosAD on April 04, 2014, 10:01:01 PM
Not really worried, i got the great KK in for him, will prob score 138

#Dreamin

Capper

Thankyou for trading him out so can score so well

Capper

and there is his century. Well played sir

browny_wce

How was Mitchell's 2nd half score!?!? 80 odd?

pommyadam

Quote from: browny_wce on April 04, 2014, 10:46:19 PM
How was Mitchell's 2nd half score!?!? 80 odd?

76
the tag went away
LOADS of possys

powersuperkents

Irrational trading irritates everyone... People have more important inquires (e.g. injury trades etc.) than you're petty complaints about players with descent scores to begin with (what did you expect him to score, in his prime -91ppg- he would have the occasional 50!! I mean seriously, everyone knows Suckling is a high ceiling player, not a consistent scorer, so taking that into account 76 is an slightly below par day for him!!!)

Think logically:
He's cheap

His BE was still EXTREMELY low!!

76 is still a good score for his price tag anyway (esp. considering popular pick like Dagerfield & McVeigh)

Why the flower would you trade him, furthermore, inquiry about it??

I was considering the same with Pav and I'm quite happy I stopped to think for a minute. Danger & McVeigh however have been less than satisfactory for me. It just a matter of looking at a players previously seasons, extenuating factors etc. basically slight research will serve this purpose rather than an decision based off your own opinion on the basis of a single match which more importantly was only the 2nd round of the season. Seriously man, don't bother inquiring unless it's a dilemma, cash drain, late withdrawal, injury concern, upgrade/downgrade etc. not a pointless rage trade.

and that's my rant in reply haha 

henry

I traded out Mitchell lol, thinking he would lose cash and crowley would shut him down. Oops. Traded him for Hanley though who's going alright at the minute...hopefully this wont jinx him.

tbagrocks

I did in SC last week but that guy scored a 109 and 111 so :)

Anywho, I think he'll get a lot more attention most games when the Coach isn't tanking against them :P