SuperCoach BE's

[Ricochet]

For those without SuperCoach Gold

http://www.scpaige.com.au/breakevens-round-3/

Some huuuuge BEs

[hawkers65]

For those without SuperCoach Gold

http://www.scpaige.com.au/breakevens-round-3/

Some huuuuge BEs

Just wondering how come they differ to the real SC Gold ones? Seem to be around 5-points off give or take a few.

[Ricochet]

For those without SuperCoach Gold

http://www.scpaige.com.au/breakevens-round-3/

Some huuuuge BEs

Just wondering how come they differ to the real SC Gold ones? Seem to be around 5-points off give or take a few.

Yeh they're way out. SC Gold is correct.
Not sure what they have done here

[roti]

Both SCpaige and TooSerious are both way out compared to SC Gold. One of them had polec with a BE of 100, rising up to about 300k, while SC Gold has him with a BE of 110 and rising up to about 263k

[Ricochet]

Yeh your not wrong. Have let them know so they should fix it

[GCSkiwi]

Both SCpaige and TooSerious are both way out compared to SC Gold. One of them had polec with a BE of 100, rising up to about 300k, while SC Gold has him with a BE of 110 and rising up to about 263k

I can tell you from SC gold Polec's BE is -110 and he's projected to rise $150k over the season. Their projections are rubbish though, it has him projected to score 60s continuously, and if he gets a 60 he'll go up 78k this round alone...

[roti]

Both SCpaige and TooSerious are both way out compared to SC Gold. One of them had polec with a BE of 100, rising up to about 300k, while SC Gold has him with a BE of 110 and rising up to about 263k

I can tell you from SC gold Polec's BE is -110 and he's projected to rise $150k over the season. Their projections are rubbish though, it has him projected to score 60s continuously, and if he gets a 60 he'll go up 78k this round alone...

Footywire was the one that seemed to be accurate to me last year, at least in terms of price increases, still showing breakevens for last year though :(

[Doggoneit]

I do my own calculations

I'm not paying for SC Gold and I don't trust other sites

Polec at -110 is correct.

[roti]

I do my own calculations

I'm not paying for SC Gold and I don't trust other sites

Polec at -110 is correct.

Can you figure out his potential increase?

[Doggoneit]

haven't worked out the price increase algorithm yet

I usually use 20% of the difference between the current 3 week avg and the points you are paying for

Eg with Polec
avg = 108
priced at 32 ($172,600 / $5350)
difference = 71
20% of 71 = 14.2
14.2 * $5350 = $75,970

Of course it will all depend on what he actually scores next week -

If he score a 50 next week then his average becomes 85 and he might only rise about $50k

Its pretty rough but if you are comparing 2 players then it is all relative.

I don't worry about the actual price rise when I'm trading as the BE and other data will tell me the relativity between players.

[timtim]

I do my own calculations

I'm not paying for SC Gold and I don't trust other sites

Polec at -110 is correct.

Haha sorry mate but have to laugh at your tight ass-ness

$24 ish for sc gold for ALL season... Just over $1 a week... For something that you're obviously passionate about. Seems a no brainer to get it

[Doggoneit]

I do my own calculations

I'm not paying for SC Gold and I don't trust other sites

Polec at -110 is correct.

Haha sorry mate but have to laugh at your tight ass-ness


$24 ish for sc gold for ALL season... Just over $1 a week... For something that you're obviously passionate about. Seems a no brainer to get it

Ok so I am a tight arse - must be my scottish heritage

I'm happy to maintain my own data as there are lots of other things I can do with it.

Eg I can weight the averages or BE's to give me better information. SC Gold doesn't do this.