Last minute decisions in the back and forward line! Which combo?

[Evan1996]

Nearly managed to finish my team but tossing up between some different players. Which combo would be better? Langdon, Langford and Zorko. Or Langdon, Suckling and Higgins

[thefuzz]

Nearly managed to finish my team but tossing up between some different players. Which combo would be better? Langdon, Langford and Zorko. Or Langdon, Suckling and Higgins

Langdon is common to both so write it as Langford+Zorko vs Suckling+ Higgins. Easier to read.
I'd say you need both Suckling and Langford and you should move things around to get both. However of those options probably option 1.

[Evan1996]

yeah thanks, i guess a better way to put it would be, is playing langford over suckling worth the risk? for the money to upgrade higgins to zorko

[thefuzz]

yeah thanks, i guess a better way to put it would be, is playing langford over suckling worth the risk? for the money to upgrade higgins to zorko

Hawks have a lot of faith in Langford- he signed a contract extension already, wasn't used as the sub and attended plenty of centre bounces. He should be solid. You really should have Suckling though, he is way to cheap to ignore.