Which combo?

[ShaynoB]

Hampson (85) & Higgins (80) v Mummy (95) & Rohan (55)

Everyone reckon this is about there averages over say the next 5-6 rounds? Would everyone go option 1 over option 2?

Just find it hard seeing Rohan at F6

Cheers.

[jamfrank]

Both your option 1 averages are extremely optimistic. The option 2 averages seem about right. Do not think Hampson can hold an 85 down, expect a few 60s and 70s to pop up, and Higgins to average more like 70-75 IMO.

[Ricochet]

I think HIggins can go 80-85. Not sure on Hampson though

[ShaynoB]

I agree, Hampson could do anything from 60-90. Surely he will go ok until Maric comes back.

May just leave Rohan at F6. Rest of the team looks solid so no real stress

[jvalles69]

I agree, Hampson could do anything from 60-90. Surely he will go ok until Maric comes back.

May just leave Rohan at F6. Rest of the team looks solid so no real stress

Hampson won't come close to an average of 90...money on it.

[nostradamus]

Hickey is a better option than Hampson

[ShaynoB]

I reckon I might just risk it and use Rohan at F6. Solid team throughout so hopefully the rest can carry him for a couple of weeks then upgrade

[DT Gun]

both hickey and hampson will let you down

[Toga]

Same dilemma for me and I've gone an Option 2 equivalent - think Rohan can hold down F6 for me for a few weeks till I find the $$ for an upgrade in the forwards.

Hickey is a better option than Hampson

I'm not sure he is - was outrucked (in HO's at least) by a pretty raw Jake Spencer the other night, and only scored 85 from it - I think he will be towelled up by the older bigger bodied rucks like Mumford who he's got this weekend.