Will you be holding S. Mitchell & P. Dangerfield?

[jamfrank]

With relatively low scores from both players who are in the top two most expensive for their respective lines, will you back them in for round 2, or wait for a price drop and try and grab them for Rd 3, saving some money along the way?

[LF]

I didn`t have Danger in this week due to his record v Cats
At this point I thinking very hard about not bringing him in atm.
Sammy I hadn`t thought about taking him out and don`t think I will.

[henry]

Yes, had both last week and will certainly keep both. Both are proven guns who will definitely be in the top 3 for their positions, why would you trade them? Danger got a 50 last year in round 1 but nearly averaged 100 for the season.

[matt1985]

Keeping danger, but swapping Mitchell for Enright. Originally wanted Enright to start with, but thought Mitchell would go alright against Brisbane. Will look to get him back in later!

[Rusty00]

I had Riewoldt in lieu of Danger for Round 1 and am starting to think I'll keep it that way at the moment.

Might drop Mitchell for now given the low score in Round 1 and he has a date with Crowley in Round 3. Pick him up later at a cheaper price.

[jamfrank]

I don't doubt that either will be in the top 4-6 of their respective lines. I just think that they're a waste of money at their current price and if you can leave yourself a bit of cash in the bank you could pick them up in Rd 3 for cheaper. Anyone know how the price changes will work for Rd 3? I.e if danger comes out and scores 100 next week, how much will he drop?

[me]

proven stars and will rise to the top while all the pretenders fall away

[fertalong]

Had both and keeping both.
They will both make the top6 in their respective lines so it's set and forget for me.

[jamfrank]

Had both and keeping both.
They will both make the top6 in their respective lines so it's set and forget for me.

proven stars and will rise to the top while all the pretenders fall away

Again, I don't disagree. However, there are 5 other players who will be in the top 6 all of whom are cheaper than these two blokes. Both of them are set for price drops come round 3, why not try and get the other 5 in for less and wait till Mitchell and Danger bottom out? One more bad score for either of them next week and you could be looking at some serious dollars saved.

[nostradamus]

l didnt start Danger this week like LF, because of his poor record against the Cats, but l did start Swan, Mitchell, McVeigh and will probably be dropping at least 2 of them this week.

Will be using a stock market approach to player trading to generate extra cash and if all goes well getting my team completed earlier.

**This weeks no-brainer is Swan out, Ablett in ........with Swanny to make a return when his price bottoms out, as will Danger

[LF]

l didnt start Danger this week like LF, because of his poor record against the Cats, but l did start Swan, Mitchell, McVeigh and will probably be dropping at least 2 of them this week.

Will be using a stock market approach to player trading to generate extra cash and if all goes well getting my team completed earlier.

**This weeks no-brainer is Swan out, Ablett in ........with Swanny to make a return when his price bottoms out, as will Danger

Swan was my Round 1 mid inclusion and I`m dropping him as well
McVeigh I think just had a bad round as did most of the Swans players so I`m holding him
And yes I`m using the same approach trying to generate as much cash as possible.
McDonald is also out of my team this week due to better cash generation/BE`s of other backs

[jamfrank]

l didnt start Danger this week like LF, because of his poor record against the Cats, but l did start Swan, Mitchell, McVeigh and will probably be dropping at least 2 of them this week.

Will be using a stock market approach to player trading to generate extra cash and if all goes well getting my team completed earlier.

**This weeks no-brainer is Swan out, Ablett in ........with Swanny to make a return when his price bottoms out, as will Danger

Swan was my Round 1 mid inclusion and I`m dropping him as well
McVeigh I think just had a bad round as did most of the Swans players so I`m holding him
And yes I`m using the same approach trying to generate as much cash as possible.
McDonald is also out of my team this week due to better cash generation/BE`s of other backs

Yep, I'm going Swan->Watson, Mitchell->Hibberd/Mackie/Enright. Didn't have Danger or McDonald, and I'm keeping it that way.

[R.Griffen]

not getting in Dangerfield until his price goes down, I think I can afford to trade Danger in but Mitchell is another player I will want back cause he will be the top scoring defender and I don't want to waste my 2 trades next week on side ways trades

[Adamant]

Definitely keeping both, hoping to gain an advantage with others trading them out.

[Toga]

I had Mitchell this week but never planned to have him come round 2, as it means I can probably afford an extra mid premo instead (and I don't mind the rookie backs at the moment!)

I didn't have Danger this week, same as LF and co., but I think I will bring him in this week, he should score much better than he did from here on in I think.