Early call but possible correction trades down the track thread

Started by HotTiges, March 22, 2014, 07:48:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

HotTiges

Not panicking but some alarming issues or potential issues.. Rockliff is one , sacrificed his usual accumulation game to play a run with role on Mitchell.Next week JSelwood at the GABA you would think.. Is this a potential correctional trade? To say a Watson? Or we wait and hope for a Raines return.. Like I said not panic stations just small alarms going off..

Anyone else have similar issues?

Daniel123

I feel like i already dont like the look of a few in my team including rocky luey and Hanley  feel there are gonna be more consitant. Better scorers out there not sure whats ur guys opinion on trading players like this, so early

Spite

Come on man, they played the best team in the competition. They weren't going to have a huge one off the bat, the rocky pick is one for the entire year. Mitchell dragged him deep and mitchell has the weapons to do that. I'd like to see Selwood play in the BP, I reckon he wouldn't last 10 seconds before needing to run head first into a contest

HotTiges

Quote from: Daniel123 on March 22, 2014, 07:51:40 PM
I feel like i already dont like the look of a few in my team including rocky luey and Hanley  feel there are gonna be more consitant. Better scorers out there not sure whats ur guys opinion on trading players like this, so early
I allow myself 3 correctional trades.Have both Leuy and Rocky... Leuy looked a touch out of sorts but I'm sure he will bounce back next week..

no eye deer

Why oh why would you use your star mid as a tagger? Hopefully it was an experiment that backfired (sort of) and Rocky will go back to the usual role next week. No point shutting down Selwood if you've got no one else to run you out of the mids. Can't believe we copped this after Vossys efforts to f$&k us over last season! >:(

HotTiges

Quote from: Spite on March 22, 2014, 07:56:06 PM
Come on man, they played the best team in the competition. They weren't going to have a huge one off the bat, the rocky pick is one for the entire year. Mitchell dragged him deep and mitchell has the weapons to do that. I'd like to see Selwood play in the BP, I reckon he wouldn't last 10 seconds before needing to run head first into a contest
Thanks for the calming influence. Like You said, Rocky is a season keeper but it's just a tad concerning that Leppa could be making him into negative type of player..we will assess next week!

HotTiges

Quote from: no eye deer on March 22, 2014, 07:58:30 PM
Why oh why would you use your star mid as a tagger? Hopefully it was an experiment that backfired (sort of) and Rocky will go back to the usual role next week. No point shutting down Selwood if you've got no one else to run you out of the mids. Can't believe we copped this after Vossys efforts to f$&k us over last season! >:(
Agree totally.sign 3 more years to be a negative run with player at certain times..alarm bells

Judd Magic

Man I knew I shouldn't have picked Leuenburger.  ::)

The warning signs were there with Trent West in the same team doing alot of the ruck work too.

I'm trading Burger out for Hampson in round 3 and pocketing the $200,000 to use for an early upgrade.

eaglesman


RaisyDaisy

No correction trades for me at this stage - very happy with who I picked, I just suck at picking the right rookies to field LOL

BlackOrWhite

Only corrective trade i might do is Clurey to Laidler. Otherwise relatively happy that i chose enright over hanley/hibberd to start with. Libba or Rocky did my head in. Went rocky and am not questioning his ability. If he plays in the guts all year has the ability to average 115+ just the brissy coaches use him in silly roles!

Samsturmfels


_wato

Webster to Laidler I'm thinking.

Caught me way off guard seeing him subbed tonight which isn't a good sign.. Clurey to Langford maybe..

jeesh

I've got 3 possible corrective trades to make. At this stage I'm thinking I'll be going Wanganeen to Langdon, Michie to Tyson after round 2 and then Ben Brown to Currie after round 3 if Goldstein miss's round 2 and Currie can hold down a spot. If people were wondering why on earth I went with Brown in the first place I wanted to have 15k spare for the Wanganeen to Langdon trade so that was the reasoning behind that. With that said if Nic Nat avoids the green vest (which will most likely mean he cops the red vest but should get 3 quarters and hopefully hit the 75 mark) I'll go with Nic Nat instead of Cox which will free up the extra cash for Michie to Tyson.

billnats

Wanted to do just one... Clurey to Langford.
But now thinking:
McDonald to Langford and Michie/Ellis to Tyson

Wont be touching Rocky for me... never sideway trade premiums.